Classic Twofer – ‘Cruising’ & ‘Hit List’ – Red Light, Red Light

Original Release Date: February 15, 1980
Written and Directed by William Friedkin
, based on the novel of the same name by Gerald Walker
Cast: Al Pacino, Paul Sorvino, Karen Allen, Richard Cox, Don Scardino, Joe Spinell, Jay Acovone, Randy Jurgensen, Barton Heyman, Gene Davis, Allan Miller, Sonny Grosso, Ed O’Neill, James Remar, William Russ, Mike Starr, Powers Boothe
Soundtrack: Jack Nitzsche

It’s virtually impossible to talk about this movie without at least some discussion of the controversy surrounding it, so I won’t pretend to ignore it.

The plot of ‘Cruising’ involves a serial killer targeting gay men in the Lower Manhattan S&M scene (which may or may not still exist today; I have a distinct lack of expertise in this area), and the effort to bring him to justice by a young undercover cop (played by Al Pacino).  Needless to say, many in the gay community were outraged at what they perceived to be an unfair portrayal, and, in fact, the protests during filming were so vigorous that none of the audio from outdoor night shoots was usable.  Combined with the fact that much of America was not ready for any sort of look at homosexuality, let alone such a lurid and peculiar slice of it, it’s easy to see how ‘Cruising’ was a critical and commercial nightmare waiting to happen (although it did just fine in Europe).

Based on the novel of the same name (though reportedly in title only), but more so based on the real-life experiences of former NYPD detective Randy Jurgensen (the film’s technical adviser and one of the supporting actors, with whom there was a Q&A with after the screening), ‘Cruising’ is a movie that is not without its issues.  The third act especially becomes somewhat disjointed, and character motivations become frustratingly hazy (not to mention Karen Allen is basically given nothing to do).  And yet, despite all of its flaws, ‘Cruising’ is a movie I would absolutely watch again in the future, even if I can’t fully articulate why.

One reason is that buried under all of the layers of controversy and shock value are a wonderfully subtle performance from Al Pacino (one of the last times audiences got to see him before he became a self-caricature, which I’m not complaining about, just saying), a beautifully eclectic musical soundtrack (including some really great stuff from Willy DeVille), and a reasonably effective crime thriller story.  Add in a lot of name actors in before-they-were-famous roles, along with more than a pinch of genuine New York City grindhouse feel, and you’ve definitely got something cooking.

It is, for sure, not his best film, and I don’t think I would recommend it for general audiences, but, William Friedkin’s ‘Cruising’ is quite the mood piece.  If you’re curious enough to step beyond the controversy (and not be put off by the more lascivious elements), check it out,  You might be surprised by what you find.

Rating: ★★★½ (out of five)

 

 

Original Release Date: March 3, 1989
Directed by William Lustig

Written by Aubrey K. Rattan (story), John F. Goff and Peter Brosnan (screenplay)
Cast: Jan-Michael Vincent, Leo Rossi, Lance Henriksen, Charles Napier, Rip Torn, Harold Sylvester, Harriet Hall, Ken Lerner, Nick Barbaro, Lou Bonacki, Robert A. Ferretti, Vic Manni, Frank Pesce
Soundtrack: Garry Schyman

This was actually director William Lustig’s personal film print, and was not only willing to share it with an audience, he also provided quite a bit of behind-the-scenes insight (not unlike what you’d find on a commentary track), so much of my information comes directly from him.

The first thing to know about this movie is that it’s loosely based on Akira Kurosawa’s ‘High and Low‘ (which is itself based on the novel ‘King’s Ransom’ by Ed McBain).

The second thing to know is that William Lustig was conversant with Nicholas Pileggi at the time Pileggi was interviewing Henry Hill (these interviews led to the book ‘Wiseguy’, which led to the movie ‘Goodfellas’), so if you think you hear dialogue in ‘Hit List’ that sounds like it’s straight out of ‘Goodfellas’, you’re not wrong (except ‘Hit List’ came out first).

Other interesting odds and ends include Jan Michael Vincent attempting to make a comeback after a couple years out of work and being, shall we say, difficult to manage (drinking problem), Charles Napier living out of a camper trailer, Rip Torn being tons of fun, Lance Henriksen’s [temporary] back tattoo costing $1000, an uncredited Janusz Kaminski receiving the offer to shoot ‘Schindler’s List’, and Scott Spiegel and Josh Becker being the actual writers (as opposed to the credited CineTel writers).

All that said, I’ll allow the director himself to sum up the movie in one sentence, “It’s ridiculous, but it’s fun.”

As for me, I’d say the movie is full of wonderful accouterments in the form of fun supporting characters and over the top action, but it unfortunately suffers from a lack of chemistry from its two lead actors.

I’ll give ‘Hit List’ credit for having at least a somewhat clever premise (all-American dad and Mafioso team up to find the former’s son), but it’s not a great movie overall.  I definitely put the ‘Maniac Cop’ trilogy above it in terms of the William Lustig catalog.

However, if you’re interested to see how Lance Henriksen might’ve handled the role of The Terminator, I recommend this movie.  It’s just a shame it likely won’t ever get a proper home release (unless you’re still good with VHS), thanks to various bankruptcies and legal entanglements.

Rating: ★★½ (out of five)

Quick Thoughts – September Round-Up, Part 2 of 2: Septemberg

I said this before in my review of ‘Bridge of Spies‘, but it’s become rather chic to hate on Steven Spielberg, and, in many ways, I get it.  He’s gotten older, he’s gotten softer, he’s made some mistakes, but, at the end of the day, he’s still Steven Spielberg: director of many great movies.  In September, I was fortunate enough to be able to revisit a handful of them in real theaters with real audiences, and it was fantastic.

Indiana Jones Marathon

Indiana Jones Trilogy (1981, 1984, 1989)

Many will disagree with me on this, but I think Indiana Jones is actually a better Harrison Ford character than Han Solo, but that discussion isn’t really why we’re here.  All three of these movies are great in their own way, and each have moments of undeniable brilliance.

‘Raiders of the Lost Ark’ is much like ‘Star Wars’: inspired by the serials of the past, but set the standard for the future, and, thanks to its success, got the ball rolling (pun absolutely intended) on a whole generation of knock-offs, rip-offs, and its own sequels.  Cannon Films alone made no less than three ‘Raiders’-inspired movies throughout the 80s (two helmed by Oscar-nominated director J. Lee Thompson).  What sets ‘Raiders’ apart and the reason it still holds up is that it’s essentially a B-movie with A-picture production; everything from the acting and directing to the music, effects, and STUNTS is top notch, and the result is one of the most-enjoyable movie experiences you’ll ever find from start to finish, no matter what the size of the screen.

‘Temple of Doom’ is very much ‘Raiders 2’; similar to the original, but darker, grittier, and more fiery (many of the action set pieces had been conceived for ‘Raiders’ but obviously not executed for it).  Many people, hardcore Indiana Jones fans or not, consider this their least favorite of the trilogy, and that’s true for me as well, but I still think it’s a great action-adventure film on its own merits.  Really, it just suffers from an identity crisis; had it not been attached to an established property, I think it would be held in higher regard.  At least you can’t accuse the filmmakers of making the exact same movie over again (looking at you, ‘Ghostbusters II’, though I still love you anyway).

‘Last Crusade’, dare I say, elevates the material.  It certainly maintains the action flourishes established by the first two, but overall it feels more mature, largely because of the father-son relationship (and John Williams took the score in a new direction).  I still get teary-eyed every time I see Henry Sr. call Henry Jr. “Indiana” for the first time.  Sean Connery gives the best performance I’ve ever seen him put on screen, and for those of you who say Harrison Ford isn’t an “ack-tour”, perhaps that’s true, but he can act; the advantage of seeing him on the big screen is you can more easily notice how much acting he does with his eyes.  ‘Last Crusade’ also lets us give proper goodbyes to fan favorites Sallah and Marcus Brody.  Maybe I’m biased because it’s the Indiana Jones movie I grew up watching the most, but ‘Last Crusade’ is my favorite of the three; hands down.

Ratings:
‘Raiders of the Lost Ark’ ★★★★½
‘Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom’ ★★★★☆
‘Indiana Jones and The Last Crusade’ ★★★★★

 

 

Jaws

Jaws (1975)

Before I got to see this on the big screen for the first time, I had actually begun to wonder if the world’s first blockbuster (and one of my favorite movies) was overrated.  What a foolish thought that was.  ‘Jaws’ is like this amazing estuary where old and new Hollywood meet, and the result is something brilliant and nearly completely timeless.  Spielberg, though not necessarily because he wanted to, borrowed much from Hitchcock in terms of monster beast strategy, while adding his own signature visual touches.  John Williams’ score is equal parts Bernard Hermann and Erich Wolfgang Korngold before him, tying together both the horror and the sea-faring adventure.  Roy Scheider, Richard Dreyfuss, and Robert Shaw are perfectly cast as three disparate men united against a common foe.

I actually think Scheider’s performance as Chief Brody might be a little underrated; the character’s arc of having to face down his biggest fear in order to protect both his own family and the islanders who only tacitly accept him is well-written enough, but he adds quite a bit of depth on his own (let’s not forget it was Scheider himself who came up with “You’re gonna need a bigger boat”).

I regret not finding out for sure, but sitting next to me was a woman who appeared to be seeing ‘Jaws’ for the first time (I base this on her reactions to, well, everything).  When you can make a movie that still scares people 40 years after its release, you know you did something right.  Kudos to Spielberg on that.

Rating: ★★★★★

 

 

Close Encounters

Close Encounters of the Third Kind (1977)

When I was a little boy in elementary school, I was very much into reading about UFOs, the Bermuda Triangle, and cryptozoological creatures, so believe me when I tell you that ‘Close Encounters’ does an incredible job of sewing together all sorts of myths, legends, and wild conspiracy theories into a serious and seriously compelling science fiction motion picture (Richard Donner would say it has Verisimilitude).  It’s been overshadowed by ‘Star Wars’ in the long run, but there’s no denying that ‘Close Encounters’ had its own distinct cultural impact, not to mention that one is science fiction and the other is science fantasy…

The true triumph of the movie, even more than the story of mankind succeeding in its search for extraterrestrial life, is the idea that music can be a truly universal language that everyone from nerdy scientists to space aliens to small children can understand.  When you factor in the level of detail written into the movie, the breadth of locations, and the fact that Carl Weathers shows up as a soldier, that’s a winner of a film in my book.

It’s a slow-burner for sure, and that’ll turn some people off, but on the whole I think it’s a must-see for the genre.

Rating: ★★★★☆