Movie Review – ‘Annihilation’ – Into The Mystic

Written and Directed by Alex Garland, based on the novel by Jeff VanderMeer
Cast: Natalie Portman, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Gina Rodriguez, Tessa Thompson, Tuva Novotny, Oscar Isaac, Benedict Wong, Sonoya Mizuno, David Gyasi
Soundtrack: Geoff BarrowBen Salisbury

Before I even get into the movie, I think it would be helpful to contextualize it, because I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t a bit confused going in.

Alex Garland’s Annihilation is based on the novel of the same name by Jeff VanderMeer, the first book in the so-called Southern Reach Trilogy.  At the time Garland wrote his screenplay, only the first novel had been published; he knew that others were to follow, but his movie is based purely on the first book, and as such, as far as I can tell, the movie is a standalone story.  It’s not intended to set anything else up; it’s just one movie and one movie only.  Hopefully knowing this will help to properly calibrate your expectations should you choose to go see the film.

I was rooting for Annihilation, I really was.  A smart, mid-budget, hard sci-fi thriller that nobody picked up international theatrical rights for because it was “too intellectual” seemed like something I could get behind, and for much of the running time I was totally on board, but, like so many “could have been great” movies, it kind of falls apart in the third act, but we’ll come back to that.

In addition to its roots as a novel, Annihilation is also a movie that, intentionally or not, appears to wear its influences on its sleeve.  I may not be a sci-fi expert, but I know Tarkovsky, Kubrick, and even a little Carpenter when I see it.  This is not to say that paying homage is inherently bad, but when it’s not on the same level of what it’s trying to be (or what other people are purporting it to be), that’s a bit of a letdown.

This is not to say that the movie is without merit (or that it’s a mere ripoff).  The performances are fairly solid, there are some well-executed and interesting visuals (one in particular that’s virtually impossible to describe), and it does a good job at maintaining a particular mood.

That is, until the end.

It’s hard to pin down exactly what the third act problem is with Annihilation, but I think it mostly comes down to what gets paid off (and/or how much) and what doesn’t.  I can’t say too much more than that without getting into spoilers, but basically there were certain moments where I wish I had gotten a little more and other moments where less would have been fine.

On the whole, it’s a solid effort, worth seeing once, but not necessarily a must-see in theaters, which is a shame.  Maybe I just don’t jibe with Alex Garland that well (like I don’t jibe with Ben Wheatley), and maybe it got over-hyped for me, but, even still, I expected a little more.

Rating: ★★★☆☆

Quick Thoughts – Summer Round-Up, Part 1

I’ve seen so many movies this past summer, new and [mostly] classic alike, that I’m a bit overwhelmed.  Consider this my first effort in clearing out the old backlog.

Rumble in the Bronx

‘Rumble In The Bronx’ (1995)

After seeing this one, I determined that people who don’t respect Jackie Chan have no place in my life.  Whether or not his movies appeal to you, you have to recognize the commitment he has to his craft.  There’s a shot in this film (left in the final cut) in which the result for ol’ Jackie was, as the NHL would call it, a pretty severe “lower body injury”.  What I’m saying here is that he basically made the movie on one leg, and you’d never know.  Does all of the Eastern humor and melodrama translate for Western audiences?  I’d have to say no.  Does that really matter?  Again, I’d have to say no (just like it doesn’t matter that Vancouver stood in for NYC).  When it comes to Chan, you want incredible stunts and captivating fight scenes, and this one delivers.  Honestly, it may not be “lethal”, but the fight with the gang (anyone else miss the inexplicably multi-racial celluloid gangs of the late 20th century?) near the end of the film is actually beautiful in its rhythm.  Heck, even the man’s warm-ups are impressive.  It might not be his best, but ‘Rumble in the Bronx’ finally made Jackie Chan a star in America, and rightfully so.

Rating: ★★★½

 

The French Connection

‘The French Connection’ (1971)

Not too much I can say about this one.  Five Oscars (Picture, Director, Actor, Adapted Screenplay, and Editing) and an amazing car chase with quite a story.  Growing up in a post-70s world, with all the action movies that followed in the genre, it’s honestly hard for me to grasp that a police movie (at least an American one) could be recognized as serious art, but this is a serious movie nonetheless.  It might not be the most purely entertaining film, but it’s definitely worth seeing more than once (if only for that car chase).

Rating: ★★★★½

 

Ex Machina

‘Ex Machina’ (2015)

Walking out of the theater, I had a much higher opinion of this movie than I do now.  It’s pretty good; it’s well photographed, and it has a very small cast of good actors giving good performances (including my boy Oscar Isaac), but the more time has passed, the more empty I feel about it, and I don’t feel all that motivated to revisit it.  There are certain genres right now, namely horror, sci-fi, and thriller (of which this movie has elements of all three), that are so down overall that moviegoers keep looking for that “messiah movie” to rescue the genre, and they’ll latch on to anything with potential.  ‘The Gift‘ got exactly this kind of treatment, and, like ‘The Gift’, this is a solid directorial debut for Alex Garland, but, also like ‘The Gift’, this movie is no messiah.  It might not be a waste of your time, but I don’t think it’ll stand the test of time.

Rating: ★★½

 

The Connection (Le French)

‘The Connection’ aka ‘La French’ (2014)

I know what you’re thinking, “Another ‘French Connection’ movie?”

Well, there was the totally fictional yet very solid ‘French Connection II‘, but we’re not talking about that.  We’re talking about a incredibly intense, gripping, and refreshing crime drama that almost feels like it was made in the period it presents (aka no CGI, just the real stuff).  Yes, it’s a foreign film, and there are subtitles, but this movie transcends language barriers like few I’ve ever seen.  More than a mere police procedural, this film deals with all the personal sacrifices real-life heroes must make for the sake of the greater good.  It makes a great companion piece to William Friedkin’s masterpiece, but works perfectly on its own as well.  I highly recommend it.

And you’ll certainly never look at Corsicans the same way again, if you even looked at them before.

Rating: ★★★★☆

 

Continued in Part 2