Movie Review – ‘Kingsman: The Golden Circle’ – Bigger and Bigger

Directed by Matthew Vaughn
Written by Jane GoldmanMatthew Vaughn, based on the comic book The Secret Service created by Mark Millar and Dave Gibbons
Cast: Taron Egerton, Julianne Moore, Jeff Bridges, Halle Berry, Channing Tatum, Pedro Pascal, Mark Strong, Sophie Cookson, Colin Firth, Elton John, Hanna Alström, Edward Holcroft, Michael Gambon, Bruce Greenwood, Emily Watson, Mark Arnold, Tobi Bakare, Samantha Womack
Soundtrack: Henry Jackman & Matthew Margeson

Right, then; break’s over.

I suppose it’s fitting that, after a month’s hiatus, I’m doing something I’ve never done before, which is reviewing a sequel to a film that I reviewed at the time of its actual release.

Kingsman: The Secret Service was definitively my favorite spy movie in a year that was chock full of good ones (not that there weren’t disappointments).  It embraced the more outlandish and fun elements of the James Bond franchise (particularly attributable to the era of the now late, great Roger Moore) while putting its own harder-edged spin on things, and I expected nothing less from its sequel (if not…Moore?).

Kingsman: The Golden Circle is definitely bigger, but is it better?

I say no.  I think it’s a bit overstuffed and a bit long for what it is, but that’s not to say I wouldn’t recommend it theatrically (especially if you’re a fan of the first one).  It is absolutely worth your movie dollars, so much so that there’s extremely little I’m willing to give away, so this’ll be a short review.

First of all, as in the original, you’ve got a great top-to-bottom cast (though very few get all that much to do), and everyone is clearly having fun with what they’re doing; which is to say this movie is like Octopussy-on-steroids in terms of the camp factor, though I will say there were at least a couple of moments that actually made me emotional, which was a genuine surprise.

Speaking of genuine surprises, I couldn’t believe how many story elements I legitimately didn’t see coming.  Sure, the main plot is just a bit predictable, but don’t tell me you were able to guess everything from the marketing.

As for the action, Golden Circle is very much in the same style as Secret Service.  No single scene offers a one-to-one comparison to the famous church sequence from the original, but it’s all executed, shot, and edited very similarly, if not actually better.

All-in-all, Kingsman: The Golden Circle is pretty much exactly what I thought it would be: a fun romp that goes too far in a few places.  It’s bonkers and it knows it, it’s got fun nods (both with and without twists) to the first movie (and what I think is a super deep cut Bond reference), and it’s got a great, young, charismatic actor in the lead.

If you’re a fan of the first one, you’ll probably really enjoy this one, as I did.  If not, I doubt there’s anything here that’ll win you over.

Not much else I can say without spoiling anything, but I recommend it heartily.

Rating: ★★★★☆

P.S.
There’s no stinger of any kind, probably because this movie is long and they respect that people need to relieve themselves, so, once the credits roll, you’re…Golden?

P.P.S.
Naturally, and as usual, thanks to Alamo Drafthouse for going all-out with the delicious specials and incredible glassware.

Movie Review – ‘Captain America: Civil War’ – Counting the Cost

Directed by Anthony Russo & Joe Russo
Written by Christopher Markus & Stephen McFeely (screenplay), based on the comic book by Mark MillarSteven McNiven, based on characters created by Joe Simon and Jack Kirby
Cast: Chris Evans, Robert Downey Jr., Scarlett Johansson, Sebastian Stan, Anthony Mackie, Don Cheadle, Jeremy Renner, Chadwick Boseman, Paul Bettany, Elizabeth Olsen, Florence Kasumba
Soundtrack: Henry Jackman

I’m not going to spend too much time on this because the reality is you’ve most likely made your mind up already, and that’s fine.

Captain America: Civil War is the latest offering in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, which is now up to 13 movies (and counting) since Iron Man first hit the screen in 2008.  It’s basically another Avengers movie because almost everyone is assembled except for Thor, Hulk, and Nick Fury, though the plot does mostly focus on the eponymous Captain.  Marvel also wisely brought back the Russo Brothers to direct the film, after their successful turn with Captain America: The Winter Soldier (which I highly rate in terms of the MCU).

I do have some issues with the movie.  For one, it’s overly long.  I’m not even saying it drags, though many may have that opinion, but I do have a problem that all the big Marvel movies are becoming 2.5 hours long.  It’s not like the Nolan Batman series where it’s a closed trilogy and you need to pack in as much as you can, Marvel has these planned out til Infinity [Wars]; maybe they could find a way to be a little more economical with the storytelling?  ‘Winter Soldier’ wasn’t that long.

Also, and this is likely related to the previous point, there are some scenes that I suppose are in the movie to connect it to future movies, but in the movie at hand they feel like superfluous vestiges (like your appendix, you can live just fine without it).  Dare I say, we may be seeing the first real signs of fatigue from the MCU, but then Dr. Strange might revitalize things a la Guardians of the Galaxy, so I don’t know.

Overall, Civil War holds a good balance of fun, action, and more serious themes of power, friendship, and the intersection of the two.  It has a great cast giving solid performances (though some appearances are little more than cameos), and I actually found myself invested in the story outside of the action set pieces.  Most importantly, there are no giant blue lasers shooting into space.

If you’re already into the Marvel Cinematic Universe, you’ll probably like it quite a bit.  If you’re coming in fresh, I don’t really know what to tell you, but I’m sure you’ll get something out of it.

Rating: ★★★½

P.S.
These pint glasses from Alamo Drafthouse are incredible.
Civil War Glasses

P.P.S.
In terms of new characters, I was underwhelmed by Black Panther, but I loved Spider-Man.

Movie Review – ‘Kingsman: The Secret Service’ – Britannia’s Got Bollocks

Directed by Matthew Vaughn
Written by Jane GoldmanMatthew Vaughn, based on the comic book The Secret Service created by Mark Millar and Dave Gibbons
Cast: Colin Firth, Taron Egerton, Samuel L. Jackson, Michael Caine, Mark Strong, Mark Hamill (yes, THAT one), Sophie Cookson, Sofia Boutella, Jack Davenport, Geoff Bell, Ralph Ineson, Edward Holcroft, Jack Cutmore-Scott, Hanna Alström, Richard Brake, Corey Johnson, Samantha Womack, Tobi Bakare
Soundtrack: Henry Jackman & Matthew Margeson

When initially asked to describe Kingsman in only three words, I simply said, “Quite a cocktail.”

And it is.

And it’s delicious.

Kingsman is a wonderfully-balanced blend of the following spirits: every Eonproduced James Bond motion picture from 1965 to 1985; Men In Black; John Landis; Quentin Tarantino; Wright/Pegg/Frost; Attack the Block; and Harry Palmer.

The result is the most gleefully fun movie I’ve seen since this past summer’s Guardians of the Galaxy.

To put it into better context, 2012’s Skyfall, in addition to being “Bond 23”, was a celebration of fifty years of the James Bond franchise, and a fitting tribute it was; very cool, very classy, and very regal.

Kingsman is also largely a celebration of Bond, but more so of the more, shall we say, ‘B-movie’ elements; those guilty pleasures that serious critics might be afraid to admit they love, but, deep down, we as fans all do.  Things like: a villain with some sort of impediment; a henchman with some sort of enhancement; massive underground lairs; unbelievable gadgets; and an outrageous, nefarious plot that puts the whole world in jeopardy; not to mention gunfights, car chases, and proper action.

At its core, Kingsman is a crowd-pleaser.  It gives the people what they want, and does so with style and flair.  I can almost guarantee I’ll go see it at least one more time in a theater.  I know it was originally slated for a fall US release (as you can clearly see at the end of this trailer), but what I can’t figure out is why this wasn’t a summer release.  I guess compared to all the remakessequels, and amusement park rides on the way, Kingsman is severely lacking in the “name recognition” department, but, then again, nobody had ever heard of Guardians of the Galaxy before, and look how that turned out; it only made three-quarters of a billion dollars worldwide.

Anyway, I hypothesized that Kingsman would be a welcome return to form for director Matthew Vaughn, after about a ten-year hiatus from the British-produced action films he cut his teeth on, and, boy, was I right.  I mean, Kick-Ass is pretty good, and X-Men: First Class has its moments, but, on the whole, they’re not that great.  Kingsman, at least from an entertainment perspective (I really need to revisit Layer Cake one of these days), is definitely Vaughn’s magnum opus to this point.  His passion for his source material (both direct and indirect) is very apparent, and, much like a Wright/Pegg/Frost production, there’s no trace of parody here; this is a love letter.

Performance-wise, I don’t think there’s an albatross in the bunch.  Colin Firth is his usual classy self as not-“James Bond”, but also most certainly gets special commendation for pulling off a very high percentage of his own stuntwork, which I can’t imagine he’s ever had to do for a film before; not to this degree, anyway.  I mean, can you think of a signature Colin Firth stunt or fight sequence?  I can’t, yet he pulls it off like a total pro here.  Kudos to you, sir.

Besides that: newcomer Taron Egerton (God Bless the Welsh) gives a very natural performance as the street rat savant “Eggsy”; Michael Caine is his regal self as not-“M”; Mark Strong puts on his best Scottish brogue as not-“Q”; and Sam Jackson gives a delightfully playful performance as not-“Steve Jobs”.  Or is it not-“Bill Gates”?  I don’t even know anymore.

If I have one legitimate criticism of Kingsman, it’s that some of the action sequences are shot/edited a little too newfangled for my taste (although it’s admittedly better than the shaky-cam madness of Quantum of Solace), and some of the visual effects could have looked better, but that’s more of a nitpick.  Given that this movie was produced on a budget one-third that of Skyfall, I’m not going to complain that much about such things.

So, if you like James Bond movies, or need a primer on why other people like James Bond movies, or if you just happen to be both an Anglophile and an action fan, then you should definitely go see Kingsman in your local movie house.

It’s fun.  It’s frenetic.  And it’s got balls.

You’ll love it.

Rating: ★★★★½

Oh, P.S.
There’s a stinger during the credits, but not afterwards.

You’re welcome.