Quick Thoughts – Catching Up On Some Classics, Part 2 of 2

Duel

Duel‘ (1971)

It’s not hyperbole to say I’d been waiting 20 years to see this movie.  I’ve been a huge ‘Jaws‘ fan for as far back as I can remember, and it’s almost inevitable that any serious discussion of that classic will broach the subject of Spielberg’s first feature (shot in about a week and a half for NBC television, but released theatrically around the rest of the world).  Is it at the same frenetic level as, say, ‘Mad Max: Fury Road‘?  No (although it wouldn’t surprise me if George Miller was somehow influenced by Spielberg’s work).  It’s much further down the scale, but ‘Duel’ is unquestionably beautiful in its simplicity.  Of course it’s always helpful to have the great Richard Matheson as your writer.  The story drags a little bit in the middle, but it can be forgiven.  The Southern California landscape is gorgeously captured, and the many driving sequences convey a real sense of danger (not to mention gratuitous shots of the Southern Pacific Railroad for all the train buffs out there).  I feel very fortunate to have seen this one in a theater, and there’s no doubt it would make a great addition to anyone’s Blu-ray collection.

Rating: ★★★★☆

 

Rolling Thunder

Rolling Thunder‘ (1977)

Before “The Exterminator“, before “John Rambo“, there was “Major Charles Rane” in one of writer Paul Schrader’s first follow-ups to ‘Taxi Driver‘.  This is another one I’d been waiting a long time to see, and, I have to say, Cristina Cacioppo perfectly introduced the movie to the audience.  She said that how you feel at the end of the film is something of a litmus test of your character.  I’m inclined to agree, and at the end of the movie I felt very much the same way as she did: a little good and a little bad.  There may have been more obscure examples before it, but ‘Rolling Thunder’ seems to be the originator of the Vietman-vet-comes-home-suffers-terrible-things-and-executes-his-own-brand-of-justice sub-genre; and, because it’s the original, all of the elements you’d expect to find are there, but they’re not tropes yet, so they feel completely different than in later such movies.  The subject matter makes it a tough watch at times, but the performances are solid all around, especially from William Devane.

Rating: ★★★☆☆

 

Roar

Roar‘ (1981)

Kudos to Drafthouse Films for tracking this down and giving it a theatrical release (which it had never previously gotten in the USA).  Billed as “The Most Dangerous Movie Ever Made”, it’s certainly the most insane film I’ve seen in a long time, maybe ever.  To be sure, there have been artistic endeavors designed to mess with your brain, but what makes ‘Roar’ different is that you struggle to comprehend the actual reality you’re witnessing on the screen.  And what really twists it is that even though you’re frightened, the movie isn’t, because the music sounds like a Mickey Mouse cartoon, and they even mix in some slapstick comedy (such as Tippi Hedren presumably being knocked out when a shelf falls on her, followed by a jar of honey spilling all over her unconscious face).  It’s crazy, it’s bizarre, and you can’t look away.  That Noel Marshall was one crazy cat.

Rating: ★★★½


Quick Thoughts – Catching Up On Some Classics, Part 1 of 2

In a twist of [what I’m pretty sure is] irony, I haven’t been writing about too many movies lately because I’ve been out seeing too many movies.  I wish I had the time to give a full review of every film I see, but I’m not quite there yet; and, frankly, sometimes I just want to enjoy a movie without it feeling like work.  That said, I have at least a little bit to say about each of the following, so let’s get to it.

Miller's Crossing

Miller’s Crossing (1990)

Honestly, this one didn’t hit me like I thought it would, but I think if I watched it again I’d appreciate it more (most Coen Brothers films tend to grow on me over multiple viewings).  Regardless, it was a pretty great way to spend St. Patrick’s Day evening, sipping down my “Remember the Maine” cocktail (oooooh, Absinthe).  The movie definitely has that signature Coen black comedy tone, and the performances are pretty fantastic across the board, especially from Gabriel Byrne, Jon Polito, and Marcia Gay Harden.  I guess what messed with my head is that I was expecting a little more snap and/or action (a la ‘Goodfellas‘), seeing as how this is a gangster film, but it works well enough on its own terms; and the cameos from the Coens themselves (and their boy Sam Raimi) are quite humorous.

Rating: ★★★½

 

The Birds

The Birds‘ (1963)

There’s a lot about this movie that probably won’t hold up for modern audiences,  to the point that they might laugh, such as some of the visual effects and acting performances.  But, you know what?  The last half hour still works.  It’s as nerve-racking as anything you’ll see today, and that’s what matters.  Typical genius work from one of the masters.

Rating: ★★★★☆

 

Bullit

Bullitt‘ (1968)

Steve McQueen might not be role model material, but he’s still one of the coolest cats to ever grace the silver screen, and this movie might just be Exhibit A.  It definitely doesn’t fit into the present-day construct of what a cop movie should feel like, because it actually focuses on being fairly true to life, especially in terms of police procedure, but, like ‘Miller’s Crossing’, I appreciate it on its own terms.  Not to mention, how do you not love a ten minute car chase sequence (which gets built up by this ridiculously amazing cue by Lalo Schifrin)?  And if that’s not enough for you, it’s got a killer cast (Jacqueline Bisset at, arguably, her most gorgeous; Robert Vaughn at his slickest; and the late, great Simon Oakland; among others), and the beautiful city of San Francisco as a backdrop.  It’s pretty grand.

Rating: ★★★★☆

Continued in Part 2