Thanksgiving Smörgåsbord: ‘The Front Runner’ – ‘Creed II’ – ‘Ralph Breaks the Internet’ – ‘Robin Hood’ (2018)

One of these things is not like the other…

Let’s get it on.

Directed by Jason Reitman
Written
by Matt BaiJay CarsonJason Reitman, based on the book All The Truth Is Out by Matt Bai
Cast: Hugh Jackman, Vera Farmiga, J. K. Simmons, Alfred Molina, Sara Paxton, Mamoudou Athie, John Bedford Lloyd, Bill Burr, Kaitlyn Dever, Molly Ephraim, Josh Brener, Mike Judge, Kevin Pollak, Ari Graynor, Mark O’Brien, Alex Karpovsky, Toby Huss, Tommy Dewey, Spencer Garrett, Nyasha Hatendi, Steve Zissis, Chris Coy, Jennifer Landon, Oliver Cooper, Courtney Ford, Jonny Pasvolsky, Randy Havens, Steve Coulter, Jenna Kanell, Gabriel Manak, Evan Castelloe
Soundtrack: Rob Simonsen

The Front Runner has gotten mixed reviews, and I think I know why (Rorschach test-type situation), but ultimately I don’t understand why.  Given that we live in the Golden Age of the Documentary, and based-on-true-story movies often fail to justify themselves, this one was a refreshing exception.

I’ll admit that I haven’t seen a Jason Reitman film since Thank You for Smoking, which I enjoyed and which The Front Runner compares favorably to, though they are distinct from each other, but to me you can’t really ask for more from a non-fantastical film-making perspective.  It’s a period piece that takes itself very seriously in that regard (which I appreciated to no end), it’s slick, the performances are by-and-large very good if not excellent (a few questionable casting decisions, but nothing unforgivable), and, at least in my opinion, it lets you make up your own mind (which is perhaps why some people are down on it).

Truthfully though, this is the Hugh Jackman show.  Not that he doesn’t have plenty of help (Vera Farmiga in particular is her usual wonderful self), but it’s certainly among the best performances I’ve ever seen from him, maybe the best so far.  I don’t know if it’ll be “impressive” enough to earn him awards season love, but it would not shock me to see him earn some nods.

It may not be an entirely life-changing experience (although it is about not only a life-changing experience, but a societal-changing experience), but given how down this year has been for movies, I have no problem giving The Front Runner a quality recommendation.

Rating: ★★★★☆

 

Directed by Steven Caple Jr.
Written
by Sylvester Stallone (story and screenplay), Juel Taylor (screenplay), Sascha Penn (story), and Cheo Hodari Coker (story)
Cast: Michael B. Jordan, Sylvester Stallone, Tessa Thompson, Dolph Lundgren, Florian Munteanu, Wood Harris, Russell Hornsby, Andre Ward, Phylicia Rashad, Jacob “Stitch” Duran
Soundtrack: Ludwig Göransson

Alright, Rocky IV: Part 3-D.  Let’s do this.

It’s crazy, because the main fulcrum of Creed II is like something a couple of kids would have thought up on a playground thirty years ago: “What if Apollo Creed had a son and Ivan Drago had a son and they fought each other?”

And yet, it works.  As predictable as it may be at times, as a sequel to a sequel to a sequel will be, Creed II still has enough in its core to be satisfying.

Story-wise, it’s not as cohesive as I remember its predecessor being, but it brings out just as much emotion (cribbing good story elements from Rocky II, III, and IV helps with that), and, frankly, from a visual standpoint, I actually think it’s a better looking film (I can’t find any numbers, but I’m guessing this had a bigger budget than the $35 million for Creed, which would be one explanation why).

In terms of performances, not everybody gets a whole lot to do (even Stallone seems to have less screen-time than in the last one), but I can’t think of anyone who sticks out in a bad way (except maybe for Max “Where’s My Camera” Kellerman).  Even Dolph Lundgren (who I like more than most other people seem to) brings his fair share to the table.  And, he only gets about three scenes, but I really liked Russell Hornsby as the fight promoter.

I know I rag on Hollywood’s lack of originality these days quite a bit, but at the same time I try to judge every movie I see on it’s own merits, and I like what Creed II brings to the table, especially as a Rocky IV fan.

Rating: ★★★★☆

 

Directed by Phil Johnston & Rich Moore
Written
by Phil Johnston (story and screenplay) & Pamela Ribon (story and screenplay), Rich Moore (story), Jim Reardon (story), Josie Trinidad (story)
Cast: John C. Reilly, Sarah Silverman, Jack McBrayer, Jane Lynch, Gal Gadot, Taraji P. Henson, Bill Hader, Alfred Molina, Alan Tudyk, Ed O’Neill, Flula Borg, Hamish Blake, Ali Wong, GloZell Green, Timothy Simons, Ana Ortiz, Jason Mantzoukas
Soundtrack: Henry Jackman

On the one hand, I want to hate on Ralph Breaks the Internet for being a giant corporate self-pleasure session (which, to be fair, it is).

On the other hand, it’s a lot of fun and it tugged at my heartstrings.

Life is complicated sometimes.

I don’t remember why I didn’t see Wreck-It Ralph in theaters, I think I was just too skeptical to pull the trigger, but eventually I came around to it on DVD and was pleasantly surprised; and the sequel is an even more pleasant surprise because it might actually be better than the original.

Does it go too far sometimes with the references for references’ sake?  Most certainly yes, but, strip all of that away (and, honestly, sometimes it is handled in clever and humorous ways, especially the princess elements), and you still have a solid story of friendship.  Simple, but solid.

It might seem obvious, given that it’s an animated film, but beyond the voice performances, which are by-and-large on point, and the music, the movie’s biggest strength is it’s detailed visual creativity.  Little things like how players in the not-Grand Theft Auto game move with a little lag as opposed to the free-flowing non-player characters, and just overall in how the Internet as a setting is portrayed, as I said, it’s a lot of fun.

Will Ralph Breaks the Internet hold up in ten to fifteen years?  Maybe, maybe not, but somehow it feels more substantial than a lot of other “time-capsule” movies.  I mean, it’s clearly geared towards Disney fanatics, of which I am not one, and I still give it a high recommendation, so, take that for what it’s worth.

Rating: ★★★★☆

 

Directed by Otto Bathurst
Written
by Ben Chandler (screenplay and story) and David James Kelly (screenplay)
Cast: Taron Egerton, Jamie Foxx, Ben Mendelsohn, Eve Hewson, Tim Minchin, Jamie Dornan, Paul Anderson, Josh Herdman, Cornelius Booth, Björn Bengtsson
Soundtrack: Joseph Trapanese

Hey, remember Batman Begins?  That was a good movie.

No, but seriously, as much as this version of Robin Hood wanted me to hate it, I can’t say I hated it.  I wouldn’t say it’s good, but it’s not all bad either.

I don’t know that it entirely works or makes sense (in fact, it’s a bit jarring at times), but I don’t fault the filmmakers for trying to do something different in terms of visual style and fight choreography.  After all, when you’re the fifty-seventh (numbers approximate) Robin Hood movie in film history, you’ve got to do something to distinguish yourself.

Honestly, even story-wise, I wouldn’t say things are entirely poor, but there are moments when the writing is so awful you can’t even believe it.  Add to this a dose of ham-fisted social and political commentary (The War on Terror is the new Crusades!  The Church is evil!), which is no surprise given that one of the producers is Leonardo DiCaprio, and some related tonal inconsistencies (much of the movie is played pretty straight, but then there are scenes, in order to paint people as cartoonishly evil, that are like The Hunger Games meets Mad Max), and you go from a pretty good movie to something you’d randomly find in a Redbox.

As I keep saying though, it’s not all bad, and most of the good comes down to Taron Egerton as Robin Hood.  Occasionally there’s a line or two that not even Laurence Olivier could make good, but on the whole his performance is charming and enjoyable, yet deeply human.

Still though, as most remakes are, 2018’s Robin Hood isn’t really worth your time or money.

You might even say that it’s a Thanksgiving turkey.

Rating: ★★½ (out of five)

Classic Twofer – ‘The Exorcist’ & ‘Idiocracy’ – Strange Bedfellows

No, these movies don’t have much to do with each other (outside of Washington D.C.?), but I saw them on back-to-back nights, so, this is what we’re doing.

 

Original Release Date: December 26, 1973/September 22, 2000
Directed by William Friedkin
Written by William Peter Blatty
, based on his own novel of the same name
Cast: Ellen Burstyn, Max von Sydow, Lee J. Cobb, Kitty Winn, Jack MacGowran, Jason Miller, Linda Blair, Mercedes McCambridge (demon voice), Barton Heyman

‘The Exorcist’ is another one of those movies, not unlike ‘Planet of the Apes‘, that exists in the collective unconscious as much as it exists as a film.  So many memorable moments have been homaged and parodied time and time again (sometimes involving Linda Blair herself) that it can be difficult to separate the movie from its cultural aura (for example, the actual exorcist doesn’t show up at the house until the third act), but I did my best to maintain a fresh perspective seeing it for the first time.

For a film often regarded as “The Scariest Movie of All Time”, I’m not sure ‘The Exorcist’ has enough in its arsenal to hold onto that crown today, but that doesn’t mean it’s not remarkable in its own right (and certain elements are still plenty shocking).

For one thing, it’s William Friedkin’s follow-up to ‘The French Connection’, so you know it’s going to be well-crafted, but, more importantly, as a human drama, ‘The Exorcist’ is as compelling as you’ll find.  The journey of what happens to this young girl and the response from her family and a host of medical, spiritual, and law enforcement professionals feels quite genuine.  Everything else, the freezing cold room, the make-up effects, the vomit, the levitating bed, all of the visual realism flows from the realistic tone of the story.

However, I do have a couple of issues.  First is pace.  This isn’t a huge problem, as overall the gradual speed works in the movie’s favor, but, at times, the film feels like it’s being deliberate for deliberate’s sake.  This is particularly true during the prologue, which is ambiguous and laconic to begin with, but it could have used some tightening up as well.

My second criticism is somewhat related to the first, and that is the entire character of Lt. Kinderman.  I like Lee J. Cobb as an actor (his turns in ‘On The Waterfront’ and ’12 Angry Men’ are near perfect), but every time he appears in ‘The Exorcist’ he’s an energy vacuum.  Whether this is merely due to his performance, the script, how he was directed, or some combination, I don’t know, but his character is boring and underdeveloped and I can’t help thinking someone else in the role would have made a positive difference.

All that said, I don’t want sound too harsh, because the movie is deservedly regarded as a classic.  If you can bare the horrific and shocking elements (and, if you can’t, just put your fingers over your eyes; I won’t judge you), it’s definitely worth seeing, even if only for the drama.

Rating: ★★★★☆

 

 

Original Release Date: September 1, 2006
Directed by Mike Judge

Written by Mike Judge (story and screenplay) & Etan Cohen (screenplay)
Cast: Luke Wilson, Maya Rudolph, Dax Shepard, Terry Crews, Anthony ‘Citric’ Campos, David Herman, Brendan Hill, Sara Rue, Robert Musgrave, Michael McCafferty, Justin Long, Patrick Fischler, Darlene Hunt, Andrew Wilson, Scarface, Thomas Haden Church, Stephen Root, Earl Mann
(narrator)
Soundtrack: Theodore Shapiro

“It’s practically a documentary now.”

This is the hacky line many folks have been spouting on account of the tenth anniversary of ‘Idiocracy’ coinciding with a most contentious and outlandish presidential election, but I’m going go ahead and sort of disagree with that there.  As frustrated as I am that the internet, an astounding invention that hypothetically should make us all smarter and more united, seems to be making us dumber and more divided, thanks largely to misinformation and lies being able to be spread as quickly as (if not entirely faster than) facts and truth, I don’t think we’ll ever see society devolve to the point that we see in ‘Idiocracy’ (it’s also important to remember that the movie is a comedy, not unlike ‘Back to the Future 2‘, which wasn’t trying to seriously predict the future either).

But hey, enough with the heavy topics.

It’s safe to say that Mike Judge has had and continues to have a successful career in show-business (I’m certainly a fan, mostly).  From eight seasons of ‘Beavis and Butt-Head’, to thirteen seasons of ‘King of the Hill’, to an upcoming fourth season of ‘Silicon Valley’ (which I’ve heard nothing but good things about; too bad I don’t have time for television), it would seem he knows comedy well enough to maintain a significant presence for well over two decades.  However, when it comes to movies, he has something of a habit of producing things that A. Get buried by the studio, one way or another; and B. Don’t get fully appreciated until after they’ve already come and gone.  Of course, we’re talking about ‘Office Space‘, but the principle applies to ‘Idiocracy’ as well (although, I’ll tell you right now, ‘Idiocracy’ is no ‘Office Space’).

‘Idiocracy’ is the kind of movie that you watch clips of on YouTube and laugh hysterically, but when you see the full film you realize it doesn’t quite jell overall.  There are individual concepts, moments, and scenes that are brilliant and hilarious (hiring Earl Mann, the voice of NFL Films, to be the narrator, was a stroke of genius), and I give the movie credit for going to a lot of uncomfortable places, but I don’t know if it ever gets better than the first five to ten minutes (especially Michael McCafferty as the Army officer giving the presentation about the hibernation project; he’s great), and that’s problematic.

Maybe I’m being too hard on it.  Maybe I’m not giving it enough credit for actually seeing the light of day (albeit briefly), but I think it just comes down to the fact that some comedy holds up over time (like ‘Office Space’), and some comedy doesn’t.  As a full movie experience, ‘Idiocracy’ doesn’t hold up well (but you can still find funny clips on YouTube).

Rating: ★★½

P.S.
The 10-Year Anniversary screening was bookended by a livestream Q&A that was more interesting and entertaining that the movie itself, which you can find here (skip ahead as needed).