Movie Review – ‘No Time to Die’ – Craig’s Last Waltz


Directed by Cary Joji Fukunaga
Written by Neal Purvis & Robert Wade, Cary Joji Fukunaga (screenplay and story), Phoebe Waller-Bridge (screenplay), based on characters created by Ian Fleming
Cast: Daniel Craig, Léa Seydoux, Rami Malek, Lashana Lynch, Ralph Fiennes, Ben Whishaw, Naomie Harris, Rory Kinnear, Jeffrey Wright, Billy Magnussen, Christoph Waltz, David Dencik, Ana de Armas, Dali Benssalah, Lisa-Dorah Sonnet, Coline Defaud, Mathilde Bourbin, Hugh Dennis, Priyanga Burford, Brigitte Millar
Soundtrack: Hans Zimmer

16 years ago today, Daniel Craig was announced as the sixth actor to play James Bond in EON Productions’ long-running franchise.

There was controversy.

He had blonde hair! He had blue eyes! He wore a life-jacket on a boat!

(As if Roger Moore was tall, dark, and handsome?)

Personally, I wasn’t bothered. Much like Batman Begins following Batman & Robin, after Die Another Day, I was ready for anything new, but I’ve talked about that at length already.


More to the present (and to borrow a joke from Mike Stoklasa): it’s been so long since the last Bond film, it’s almost time for my pon farr!

To be fair, it wasn’t quite the 2313 days between Licence to Kill and Goldeneye, but is the 2163 days between SPECTRE and No Time to Die that far off?

Not really, but what’s important is that the movie is here at last, which means Daniel Craig can finally start to get on with his life (and I don’t mean that disparagingly).


Unlike the previous go around, I didn’t do much to get myself hyped up for this installment, because there’s no way any Bond movie could be worse following SPECTRE (though I would recommend a re-watch before seeing the new one, or at least a read through the plot on Wikipedia).

The reaction so far seems somewhat divided, which makes sense, but like so many things these days, the minority is far noisier than the majority of people who have been reasonably satisfied with the product.

But enough about all that.


To me, No Time to Die feels like the first time in the Craig era where everyone involved (including Hans Zimmer!) said, “Hey, let’s go out and make a James Bond movie; because that’s what we do, right?”

Not that I haven’t liked what they’ve done overall to this point, and not that they haven’t previously pulled inspiration from the original source (Casino Royale especially) and past films, but, in many ways, No Time to Die feels like a movie made by somebody who’s a fan the way I’m a fan. Someone who’s seen every movie more than once and can find something they like in each one (or almost, in my case).

In fact, it’s fitting that the MacGuffin of this movie revolves around DNA, because this feels like the only film in the franchise thus far that truly pulls something from every iteration of Bond: Connery, Lazenby, Moore, Dalton, Brosnan, Craig himself, and, yes, Ian Fleming’s novels. On top of that, it does an admirable job of picking up the tatters of some poor serialization in the previous entry and finding a thread to carry forward into this film.

And, of course, it’s a farewell to Daniel Craig in the role.


Of all the Bond actors who have had at least four cracks at the character, Craig certainly gets the strongest exit of any of them; which isn’t exactly difficult given that the competition is Diamonds Are Forever, A View to A Kill (which I do enjoy), and Die Another Day, but the point still stands.

Exactly how much of this we can lay at the feet of writer/director Cary Fukunaga, I can’t say for certain, but I wouldn’t be upset if he came back for another one down the line.


If I have one particular criticism of No Time to Die, it’s that there’s some dodgy CGI sprinkled in that I can’t help thinking would have been better handled in the Brosnan era. And I don’t mean that they would have done it 100% in-camera, I just think more effort would have gone into perhaps shooting things in miniature and compositing in other elements.

And yes, the movie felt a bit long the first time I saw it, but upon seeing it a second time, it really didn’t bother be at all.


In the end, I’m hedging myself on a rating a little bit, but perhaps the best compliment I can give is that having seen the movie twice, I do feel a desire to see it at least a third time, and that doesn’t come around too often.

And if you can see it in IMAX, all the better.

Rating: ★★★★☆

Punk Rock Economy – Talking Connery’s Bond on ‘The Cooler Than Ecto Podcast’

Artwork edited by Engelyna

Back in the Spring I got to jump on The Cooler Then Ecto Podcast with DJ Rob Champion (Facebook, Instagram, Soundcloud) to talk Pierce Brosnan’s career as James Bond, in celebration of the 25th anniversary year of Goldeneye.

Since then, we’d always planned to link up again to talk Daniel Craig’s tenure ahead of No Time to Die, but since that film was pushed back yet again (to April 2021), we decided to talk Connery’s Bond instead (and we absolutely decided that weeks before his passing on October 31st; we have the receipts to prove it).

Now, seven films is a lot to talk about (especially for me who doesn’t talk much in everyday life), so, naturally, we broke it up into two separately recorded episodes, but it was still quite the challenge to prepare for (doubly so for Rob since the only one he’d ever seen previously was Goldfinger), and it certainly didn’t help that it was during one of the most distracting weeks of our lives.

Still, I’d say we did a pretty good job, and having someone well-experienced with these films and having someone seeing them with totally fresh eyes made for an ideal discussion pairing.

Links below.

Sean Connery 007 Series Retro Review Part 1 (Dr. No, From Russia With Love, Goldfinger):
Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Soundcloud, Stitcher, Google Podcasts

Sean Connery 007 Series Retro Review Part 2 (Thunderball, You Only Live Twice, Diamonds Are Forever, Never Say Never Again):
Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Soundcloud, Stitcher, Google Podcasts

Bonus:
Pierce Bronsnan 007 Series Retro Review (Goldeneye, Tomorrow Never Dies, The World is Not Enough, Die Another Day):
Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Soundcloud, Stitcher, Google Podcasts


Classic Twofer – A 007 Double Feature: ‘For Your Eyes Only’ & ‘The Spy Who Loved Me’

Roger Moore passed away a month ago at the age of 89.

Officially (it’s a long story why I have to say “Officially”), he was the longest-tenured actor to play James Bond, making seven films (I guess he truly was 007) over twelve years, from Live and Let Die in 1973 to A View to a Kill in 1985 (and appearing in thirteen other films over the same period, a few of which I’d personally recommend).

To the surprise of some, I’m sure, he was also the oldest, so it’s natural that he’d be the first to leave us, but it makes the occasion no less melancholy.

It’s no secret how much I love James Bond. and with Moore’s death I gave some serious thought as to which 007 portrayal is my favorite.  Honestly, in terms of overall body of work, I have to give it to Roger.  Sure, Connery has my favorite individual movie (From Russia With Love), but Moore is just so charming, and so dryly humorous, and he clearly enjoyed what he did.

He often gets blamed for the “campy” turn the franchise took in the Seventies and Eighties, but as Isaac Chotiner so expertly pointed out, the writing was already on the wall with Diamonds Are Forever (I mean, that movie is Schlock with a Kapital K), before Moore was officially brought on board, so, blame Roger if you want, but, you’re wrong.

Anyway, in the wake of Moore’s passing, I was hoping somebody out there would put together a tribute screening, and, fortunately, AMC Theaters did just that (appropriately raising money for UNICEF in the process, for whom Roger was a long-time ambassador), and they did a good job of picking two out of seven choices (although I’m not sure why they were shown out of order at the screening I attended), in that they pretty much show the full breadth of the franchise, from down-to-earth to over-the-top (and, as most post-1969 Bond movies are either rehashes of From Russia With Love, Goldfinger, or You Only Live Twice, these two definitely fall in line).

My only nitpick is that neither of these films feature a score by John Barry, but I suppose you can’t have everything all the time.

Let’s get to it.

 

Original Release Date: June 26, 1981
Directed by John Glen
Written by Richard Maibaum and Michael G. Wilson
Cast: Roger Moore, Carole Bouquet, Topol, Lynn-Holly Johnson, Julian Glover, Cassandra Harris, Jill Bennett, Michael Gothard, John Wyman, Jack Hedley, Lois Maxwell, Desmond Llewelyn, Geoffrey Keen, Walter Gotell, James Villiers, John Moreno, Charles Dance, Toby Robins, Stefan Kalipha, Graham Crowden, Noel Johnson, Paul Brooke, Eva Reuber-Staier, John Wells, Janet Brown, John Hollis, Jeremy Bulloch, Victor Tourjansky
Soundtrack: Bill Conti

This has always been one of my favorites in the Bond franchise, and it’s definitely one of the most low-key (like if Mike Stoklasa got his wish and they made a live-action Batman movie where he just takes down one crime syndicate).

Not that For Your Eyes Only isn’t without it’s more over-the-top moments, e.g. the pre-title sequence where Bond dispatches of an unnamed “Blofeld” (that long story again), the hockey rink scene, and the “Margaret Thatcher” ending.  But, by and large, it’s fairly reigned in; perhaps the grittiest of Moore’s tenure.

The basic outline is something of a cross-pollination of From Russia With Love and Thunderball, in that Bond has to track down a sunken MacGuffin device to make sure it doesn’t fall into the wrong hands, and there’s a gorgeous girl who’s closely related to it along for the adventure.

In terms of Bond movie elements, as silly as the pre-title sequence is, I like that it’s completely unrelated to the rest of the plot; this would only happen one more time in Octopussy (much like that cameo from Smithers, but we’ll talk about that later) and as of SPECTRE it’s still yet to happen again.  I also enjoy when Bond has strong allies (a la Kerim Bey) at his side, and I like that Q gets to have a humorous moment outside of his lab, so these are pluses as well.  Sadly, Bernard Lee died before his scenes could be filmed, so M is conspicuously absent.

As far as the cast goes, it may not be the longest list of all-stars (I’m still not sure why they cast Topol, but I’m not complaining; he’s great in this), but it’s well-assembled nonetheless (and how Julian Glover got to be in Star Wars, James Bond, and Indiana Jones is a delicious mystery).  Everybody fills their roles nicely and helps bring out the appropriate emotional response to each scene.  Nobody’s particularly flamboyant or scenery-chewing, but that’s fine in this movie.  One might argue that the one sore spot is Lynn Holly-Johnson as Bibi Dahl, but I think she’s true to the character as written, so ultimately I don’t take issue with her performance.

I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention long-time Bond veteran but first-time director John Glen (who would helm the franchise for the whole of the decade) and first-time Bond cinematographer Alan Hume (who would see out Moore’s tenure, and also shot a little movie called Return of the Jedi).  Most Bond films excel visually, but I particularly like the look of this one, especially all the magic hour stuff.

Really, I’d say For Your Eyes Only is just about the perfect Bond movie, except for one thing: no trains the music.

This is not to say that Bill Conti isn’t a fine composer in his own right, and, to be fair to him, there are at least one or two cues I really enjoy, but, on the whole, I don’t think he’s a fit, and his sound sticks out like a sore thumb in this context.

Other than that, it’s hard to complain.  You’ve got James Bond, beautiful women, travel to a variety of locations, guns, cars, underwater photography, helicopter stunts, skiing, climbing, and Détente.

Outside of a train fight, what more could anyone ask?
(Speak of the devil and he shall appear.)

Rating: ★★★★½ (out of five)

 

Original Release Date: July 8, 1977
Directed by Lewis Gilbert

Written by Christopher Wood and Richard Maibaum
Cast: Roger Moore, Barbara Bach, Curd Jürgens, Richard Kiel, Caroline Munro, Walter Gotell, Geoffrey Keen, Bernard Lee, George Baker, Michael Billington, Desmond Llewelyn, Edward de Souza, Vernon Dobtcheff, Lois Maxwell, Nadim Sawalha, Eva Reuber-Staier, Robert Brown, Milton Reid, Cyril Shaps, Milo Sperber, Albert Moses, Shane Rimmer, Ray Hassett, Jeremy Bulloch, Victor Tourjansky
Soundtrack: Marvin Hamlisch

Ah, the first Bond movie of the post-Saltzman era (and post-Hamilton era; coincidence?).

The Spy Who Loved Me marks a return to BIG for the franchise.  Wider widescreen, bigger sets (the 007 Stage at Pinewood Studios was first built for this film), bigger stunts (the parachute jump), bigger miniatures (not even joking), bigger henchman (Jaws), bigger frenemies (the Soviets are brought in like we’ve never seen before), etc., all of which are completely appropriate given that it’s the first of two consecutive rehashes of You Only Live Twice (this and Moonraker, which is another favorite of mine despite being the polar opposite of For Your Eyes Only), also directed by Lewis Gilbert (and both featuring Blofeld stand-ins, although I do enjoy Curd Jürgens in this).

As I said before, most Bond movies excel visually, The Spy Who Loved Me being no different (apparently Stanley Kubrick himself gave some secret assistance), but this one really lays on the old movie magic.  From Ken Adam’s gigantic sets to Derek Meddings’ “miniatures” (honestly, this movie has some of the best model work I’ve ever seen; not that everything looks great, but certain things legitimately look plausibly full-size, and in water to boot) to the Lotus that transforms into a submarine, it’s hard not to feel a sense of wonderment when the movie goes big.

However, the film is unfortunately weighed down by a pair of albatrosses.

First off is Barbara Bach’s performance as Anya Amasova aka Agent XXX (GET IT!?).  The less said about it, the better.

Second is Marvin Hamlisch’s score, which is crazy, because I have to dog a guy who’s not only an EGOT winner, but has a Pulitzer Prize on top of it.  But, you know what?  It wasn’t my decision to go Full Disco.  That was his choice, and it was a poor one (to be clear though, it’s not the worst top-to-bottom score in Bond history).  The title song is great though, I won’t deny that (even if it feels slightly out of place).

As far as the Bond movie elements go, this one makes heavy use of Bond’s Royal Navy cover, which I’m a big fan of, and we’re introduced to Robert Brown as Admiral Hargreaves (who would replace Bernard Lee as M in from Octopussy to Licence to Kill).  We’re also introduced to Walter Gotell as General Gogol (M’s opposite number in Moscow), who would feature from this film through The Living Daylights.  And there’s a train fight, which always makes me happy (even if it’s not nearly as good as the original).

In the end, The Spy Who Loved Me is number one (or close to it) on a lot of people’s Bond lists, but I’ve never seen it that way (feels like nostalgia over judgement to me).  Not that I dislike it, I’m happy to watch it, I just think the general consensus is somewhat inflated.  I recommend it well enough, but more so as a cultural touchstone than as a movie.

Although, it was Roger Moore’s favorite, which is a much better note to end on.

Rating: ★★★½ (out of five)

Nobody did it better.

 

P.S.
For you Empire Strikes Back fans out there, in addition to Julian Glover (aka General Veers), Jeremy Bulloch (aka the guy in the Boba Fett suit) has a cameo as “Smithers” in For Your Eyes Only (and Octopussy), and is also a submarine crewman in The Spy Who Loved Me.  And John Hollis (aka Lobot) plays the unnamed “Blofeld” during the intro of For Your Eyes Only.

You might also recognize Ray Hassett, who plays another crewman in The Spy Who Loved Me, who’s the guy who informs Han Solo that Commander Skywalker never checked back in to Echo Base (and also plays “Harry” the unfortunate policeman in Superman).

Movie Review – ‘SPECTRE’ – Tell Me Something I Don’t Know

SPECTRE

Directed by Sam Mendes
Written by John Logan and Neal Purvis & Robert Wade (story and screenplay), Jez Butterworth (screenplay)
Cast: Daniel Craig, Christoph Waltz, Léa Seydoux, Ben Whishaw, Naomie Harris, David Bautista, Monica Bellucci, Ralph Fiennes, Simon Lenagan
Soundtrack: Thomas Newman

As I said in my review of The Man from U.N.C.L.E., it’s been a great year for espionage-action films.  We’ve had the aforementioned U.N.C.L.E., we’ve had another wonderful installment of Mission: Impossible, and we started off the year in grand fashion with Kingsman.

But, let’s be real here.  SPECTRE was always slated to be the crown jewel for 2015.

Expectations have been sky high, and rightfully so.  You’ve got the same critically-acclaimed director from Skyfall (Sam Mendes is the first consecutive Bond director since John Glen in the 1980s), the same writing team from Skyfall (Logan, Purvis & Wade, plus Jez Butterworth, who co-wrote the screenplay for Edge of Tomorrow), a cinematographer and an editor who know how to handle big, beautiful movies (Hoyte Van Hoytema and Lee Smith shot and edited Interstellar, respectively), plus, you’ve got the key cast back (Craig, Whishaw, Harris, and Fiennes), and you’ve got Christoph Waltz, who played one of the top two villains of the previous decade (much like Javier Bardem), as the bad guy in this movie.

AND, if that all wasn’t enough, this is the first official (that is, Eon-produced) 007 movie to use the SPECTRE organization since Diamonds Are Forever in 1971.

So, what happened?  Does SPECTRE deliver?  Or is it crushed under the weight of so much expectation?

Well, as a Bond movie fan who’s seen every single last film (you can read my documentation on the subject here, here, and here), I have to say, the result is a bit muddled, like a dirty martini.

To be sure, there are many wonderful moments in SPECTRE, but the movie as a whole is a bit long and a bit overly serious, making for an experience I find troublingly hard to recommend outright.

Not only that, but I found the story frustratingly predicable, and I don’t know if it’s because I’m such a James Bond fan, or if the movie just generally telegraphs its punches to anyone watching, or perhaps a little of both, but when a movie like this doesn’t have anything to surprise you with, it dulls the experience considerably.

The main strength of SPECTRE is, without question, the visuals.  There are many beautiful establishing shots of both cities and natural landscapes, there are some wonderful-looking explosions, and we know who’s punching who in each action scene.  The pre-credits sequence also features some great cinematography, with some nice long shots that track all around.

Performance-wise, love him or hate him, Daniel Craig is still doing his 007 thing, and Christoph Waltz, as we know, is a wonderful villain.  I can’t say I was truly impressed by anyone else though, but I venture to guess that has as much to do with the script as anything else.

If it wasn’t obvious already, the story and screenplay are the biggest weaknesses of this good-looking (though not as beautiful as Skyfall) film.  There’s not too much I can say without getting into spoiler territory, but let’s just say some elements compare to Star Trek: Into Darkness, and I don’t mean that as a compliment.  That’s not to say there aren’t some brilliantly quotable lines, but you have to wade through so much other stuff to get to them that I began to question if it was worth it.  Frankly, for a movie as long as SPECTRE is, and given that it does tie in the three previous Craig films, I didn’t get as much closure about certain things as I would have hoped from an overall story perspective, and that’s disappointing.

Also, I didn’t like how many of the characters were handled, as if the writers felt compelled to give them something to do even though it’s unprecedented for them to be doing anything of the kind.  If you see the movie, you’ll know exactly what I mean.

As I’ve said before, James Bond movies are meant to be solid entertainment, and if they veer too much away from that core, either too campy or too serious, things start to break down.  If I was going to compare SPECTRE to another film in the franchise, it would have to be The World is Not Enough: nice to look at, but leaves me feeling a bit empty inside.  Perhaps I’ve been conditioned by the other spy action movies of this year to expect that such films should be fun experiences, but I stand by my statement nonetheless.

And, you know what else?  I didn’t like the main titles sequence at all, either visually or the song.

The ultimate question is, of course, is SPECTRE worth it?  I’d say yes, but don’t feel self-conscious about seeing it at a discount price.  And, given how long it both is and feels, make sure you put a premium on comfort.

Rating: ★★★☆☆

P.S.
I’m sure some people will comment that Monica Bellucci is too old, but she’s still fine by me.