Punk Rock Economy – Talking Connery’s Bond on ‘The Cooler Than Ecto Podcast’

Artwork edited by Engelyna

Back in the Spring I got to jump on The Cooler Then Ecto Podcast with DJ Rob Champion (Facebook, Instagram, Soundcloud) to talk Pierce Brosnan’s career as James Bond, in celebration of the 25th anniversary year of Goldeneye.

Since then, we’d always planned to link up again to talk Daniel Craig’s tenure ahead of No Time to Die, but since that film was pushed back yet again (to April 2021), we decided to talk Connery’s Bond instead (and we absolutely decided that weeks before his passing on October 31st; we have the receipts to prove it).

Now, seven films is a lot to talk about (especially for me who doesn’t talk much in everyday life), so, naturally, we broke it up into two separately recorded episodes, but it was still quite the challenge to prepare for (doubly so for Rob since the only one he’d ever seen previously was Goldfinger), and it certainly didn’t help that it was during one of the most distracting weeks of our lives.

Still, I’d say we did a pretty good job, and having someone well-experienced with these films and having someone seeing them with totally fresh eyes made for an ideal discussion pairing.

Links below.

Sean Connery 007 Series Retro Review Part 1 (Dr. No, From Russia With Love, Goldfinger):
Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Soundcloud, Stitcher, Google Podcasts

Sean Connery 007 Series Retro Review Part 2 (Thunderball, You Only Live Twice, Diamonds Are Forever, Never Say Never Again):
Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Soundcloud, Stitcher, Google Podcasts

Bonus:
Pierce Bronsnan 007 Series Retro Review (Goldeneye, Tomorrow Never Dies, The World is Not Enough, Die Another Day):
Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Soundcloud, Stitcher, Google Podcasts


Quick Thoughts – Bond in Motion: A Diary of 007 On Screen, Part 1 of 3

Bonds

This is a bit counter to one of People Talking’s principles, because I’ve not seen any of these in a theater lately (although I’ve already reviewed ‘Thunderball’), but in preparation for ‘SPECTRE’, I’ve watched every single James Bond motion picture (including both non-EON films and a 1954 episode of CBS’s ‘Climax!’), and recorded my fresh thoughts and impressions of each in this space.

As there are 26 separate items to digest, these will be published in three posts over a three day period, rather than all at once.

 

1954: Casino Royale (CBS’s ‘Climax!’)

  • Well, now I know that everyone should really start with this one first, because it actually explains Baccarat (apparently it’s like Blackjack, except you’re trying to get closest to Nine, Aces are worth One, and Tens and Face Cards are worth Zero).
  • Barry Nelson as American James “Jimmy” Bond is very American; “Clarence” Leiter is very British (even though Michael Pate was actually Australian).
  • Peter Lorre as the first on-screen Bond villain is quite apropos.
  • It shows its age, but it’s still pretty dramatic; I imagine a television audience in the Fifties would have found it quite thrilling.

 

1962: Dr. No

  • Much like ‘Star Trek: The Motion Picture’, a lot of fans and people in general refer to ‘Dr. No’ as “The Boring One”, and I understand that comment, especially in comparison to the films that followed, but I’ve always had a soft spot for it.
  • I like the fact that other than his new Walther PPK and a geiger counter, there are no “Bond Gadgets” in this one; that’s a precedent yet to be set.
  • Really, ‘Dr. No’ feels more like a detective story than a spy movie as we think of them today; James Bond, while suave and sophisticated, is honestly in over his head by the end of the movie.
  • One precedent that is set in ‘Dr. No’ is the super-villain complete with amazing super-villain lair.  For a film with a relatively low-budget (most of the non-principle guys and girls are dubbed over by the same guy and girl, respectively), Ken Adam did some great production design.

 

1963: From Russia With Love

  • Ahhh, sequels; double the budget of the original and see what happens.  This is actually a great sequel because it does two things good sequels should do: pick up after the last movie (Sylvia Trench shows up at the beginning again; SPECTRE wants revenge for Dr. No), and expand the universe (first “appearance” of SPECTRE’s “Number One”).
  • Multiple Bond movie precedents are set: first pre-title scene (with a twist!), first title song (although it’s not sung during the opening credits, but rather the end credits), first “appearance” of Blofeld, first appearance of Desmond Llewelyn as Q, and first appearance of an actor whose character is killed off in one movie, but returns on screen in another movie as a new character (Walter Gotell appears in this movie as Morzeny; returns later in six Moore/Dalton movies as Soviet General Gogol).
  • We haven’t gone full 007 yet.  ‘From Russia With Love’, while far more expansive geographically than ‘Dr. No’, is still low-key compared to the rest of the franchise, and I rather like it because of that.  The “gadgets” are still very plausible (I rather like the compact sniper rifle), and even the goals of the villains are pretty small and personal; no doomsday machines or worldwide extortion plots.

 

1964: Goldfinger

  • First of all, James Bond in the USA, everybody.  James Bond in America.  I have to think that had a factor in the popularity of this one.
  • Second of all, now we’re talking.  This is like ‘Friday the 13th: Part 3’ when Jason Voorhees puts on the hockey mask.  We’ve got a pre-title scene with our hero, a title song actually sung over the opening credits, ridiculously named women (Pussy Galore?  C’mon.), we’ve got things that don’t exist in real life (like “skin asphyxiation”), we’ve got the kitted-out Aston Martin, we’ve got a henchman with some kind of impediment, Felix Leiter is played by a different actor than the last time, and we’ve got 007’s magical…appendage (it turns bad girls good).  This is the James Bond franchise from here on out, people.  Embrace the madness.
  • Also, compared to ‘From Russia With Love’, which has about a full hour of mostly build-up, ‘Goldfinger’ gets off to a fast start; I’m talking like five minutes after the opening credits, we’re in it.
  • What was even the point of the Masterson sisters?  Maybe they had a larger role in the novel, but they seem awfully expendable in the movie.
  • Honestly, as seemingly important as it is to the franchise, I’m not sure Goldfinger ranks in my personal Top 5 Bond Movies.

 

1965: Thunderball

  • Go big or go home.  This was the first Bond film shot in 2.35 : 1 Panavision widescreen (‘Dr. No’, ‘From Russia With Love’,  and ‘Goldfinger’ were all shot in 1.37 : 1 aspect ratio).
  • Another movie, another actor playing Felix Leiter.
  • Four 007 pictures in four years?  Now I know why Connery got so burned out on the role.
  • Baccarat scenes carry so much more weight when you know how Baccarat actually works.
  • Claudine Auger, I mean, just, wow.
  • Fans of ‘The Dark Knight’ will recognize the Skyhook recovery system.
  • I’ve already talked about this movie; you can read more thoughts here.

 

1967: Casino Royale (non-Eon)

  • What?
  • You know when a movie is so incomprehensible that somebody says, “It feels like it was directed by five different people”?  This actually was directed by five different people, and it feels as such.
  • That said, this ‘Casino Royale’ is meant to be a comedy, so I don’t judge it the same was as any other Bond movie.  It definitely has its laughs, but as parody movies go, it’s got nothing on Mel Brooks.
  • If you’ve ever wondered where the spinning bed scene in ‘Austin Powers’ came from, it came from this movie (among other things, like Burt Bacharach).
  • Also, classic ‘Family Guy’ fans will recognize one of the musical cues from Stewie’s “sexy party” cutaways.
  • A few actors in ‘Casino Royale’ had already been in other previously released Bond films, and many more would feature in 007 movies yet to come.

 

1967: You Only Live Twice

  • We’ve always known Universal Exports as part of Bond’s cover, but this is the first movie to make reference to his military rank (Royal Navy Commander).
  • Also, first fully on-screen appearance of Ernst Stavro Blofeld, played by Donald Pleasence (perfectly cast).  SPECTRE’s Number One finally gets a face, and what a face it is.
  • Ninjas!?  I know Menahem Golan took credit for introducing Western audiences to Ninjas with ‘Enter the Ninja’, but it would appear he was well-beaten to the punch.
  • Two years after showing off the jetpack, James Bond gets another flying machine to wear a geeky helmet in (Little Nellie).
  • This is the first Bond movie where 007 doesn’t get his orders from M in London, but rather some exotic location (in this case, a submarine).  In fact, the whole movie takes place outside the Western hemisphere.
  • I particularly like the music in this one.  Very lush and cinematic.
  • What does 007 need with a bunch of MSG?  Seriously, as part of his subterfuge at Osato, he asks for a bunch of monosodium glutamate.  Weird.
  • Really interesting: author Roald Dahl wrote the screenplay for this one.

 

1969: On Her Majesty’s Secret Service

  • Well, Sean Connery’s gone; replaced by Australian-born George Lazenby, who is different in so many ways.
  • Up until the Daniel Craig era, this was the longest Bond movie, clocking in at almost two-and-a-half hours.
  • Diana Rigg.  Yes, please.
  • It feels like they decided to pretty completely throw out the “Bond formula” for this one.  It’s slightly psychedelic and a just a touch campy, but at the same time very personal and human.  I don’t think there’s another film in the Eon series that offers a true comparison.  I mean, you’ve got a courtship montage, he’s falling in love, we see him very vulnerable, we see him totally screwed and ready to just give up; this is not the James Bond we’ve been accustomed to, then or now.  It’s like he’s a real human being who doesn’t have all the answers.
  • First time in the series that 007 tries to tender his resignation, and the first time he goes rogue.
  • So, is the character still supposed to be the same even though it’s a different actor?  He breaks the fourth wall by saying, “This never happened to the other fellow,”  but then there are multiple direct references to the past films in the series, as if it was him.  I don’t know.
  • Apparently the downbeat ending was actually supposed to be the intro to the next movie, but then Lazenby’s agent gave him some really dumb advice and convinced him to quit the role, thus setting the stage for a one-off return of Sean Connery.

 

1971: Diamonds Are Forever

  • Oh, boy.  The panic moves.  “Oh, no; people didn’t like the last one.  We gotta bring back Sean Connery (even though he’s older and doesn’t really look like James Bond anymore), we gotta bring back Guy Hamilton to direct; we even have to bring back Shirley Bassey to sing the theme song.  And the last one ended on a downer, so we gotta make this one funnier.”
  • The movie starts out with Bond all pissed off and looking for Blofeld, I assume to get revenge for his wife, but they never say so; again, is it the same character?  I don’t know.
  • The main gimmick for this one is James Bond in Las Vegas, and, much like Vegas, everything feels a bit cheap and trashy (and campy), especially that moon rover thing.  It just looks awful.
  • It’s not all bad though, I like Jimmy Dean (even though it’s totally random why he’s in it), and I like Charles Gray’s approach to the Blofeld character.  And who wouldn’t love some Jill St. John?
  • That said, there are a number of elements in this one that ‘Austin Powers’ borrowed, and rightfully so (like the cover industrial organization).

Continued in Part 2

Quick Thoughts – Summer Round-Up, Part 2

Continued from Part 1

The Stepfather

‘The Stepfather’ (1987)

With the proliferation of PG-13 “horror” films these days, it’s almost hard to imagine a movie actually adding things to justify an R-rating, but back in the day the producers of ‘The Stepfather’ saw a PG-13 rating as a potential marketing problem.  Really though, the whole movie was kind of a marketing problem.  As you can gather from the poster, this got pushed out as something of a slasher movie, but it’s really more of a Hitchcockian thriller, like if ‘Rear Window’ and ‘Psycho’ had an Eighties baby (not that it’s Hitchcock-level quality, but the director apparently saw it as more of a dark comedy, which is a lens Hitchcock viewed much of his own work through).

We already know who the bad guy is from the very beginning, so the tension doesn’t come from the audience discovering who the killer is, but rather the characters in the movie.  It really only works as a product of its time (why they even tried to remake it and update it is beyond me), but it’s effective, and it still holds up pretty well today. despite the generational gap.

Terry O’Quinn’s performance is unquestionably the centerpiece of the film.  He’s on his A-game as a very disturbed individual trying to see if he can finally hold it all together, but the supporting actors, particularly Jill Schoelen, hold their own as well.

It might get a little corny at times, but for a horror/thriller, ‘The Stepfather’ makes a solid movie night pick.

Rating: ★★★½

 

Thunderball

‘Thunderball’ (1965)

“There’s a lot of movie in that movie.”

It’s a true statement of pretty much every Bond film since ‘Goldfinger’, but it’s perhaps most true of ‘Thunderball’.  In fact, there’s so much movie here it’s almost exhausting: you’ve got airplanes, you’ve got nuclear weapons, underwater combat, fast cars, deadly sharks, multiple bombshell women, fast boats, world extortion, electrified conference room chairs, Bahamian street festivals, an actual jetpack, Tom Jones singing, and a peeing dog.

All that said, while you do feel its length, I appreciate the producers’ effort to make a real crowd-pleaser.  The underwater scenes in particular, from both a visual and technical perspective, are overwhelmingly impressive, even now (“it’s so dense, every single image has so much going on…”).

Now, I’ll be honest, I actually like the remake (‘Never Say Never Again’) better, but only because the interplay between Sean Connery and Klaus Maria Brandauer is so much fun, at least in my opinion.  On the whole, I’d say ‘Thunderball’ remains the superior film (especially in the Bond Girl department).  Plus, ‘Thunderball’ might be the most influential spy movie on pop culture in general (it’s still the highest grossing Bond film when you adjust for inflation).

Rating: ★★★★☆

 

Who Framed Roger Rabbit

‘Who Framed Roger Rabbit’ (1988)

Boy, that Bob Zemeckis sure had a strong foothold on the mid to late Eighties, didn’t he?

I think computers have made us numb to the appreciation of animation, but back in the day (and even as recently as 2004) it was a highly labor-intensive process.  It may not have been the first and it certainly wasn’t the last, but I personally don’t know of another film that blends live-action and traditional animation to the degree that ‘Roger Rabbit’ does, and in that sense alone it is an incredible triumph of cinema.

Perhaps lost on today’s audiences is the wrangling of so many different characters from different (and, traditionally, very competitive) animation studios to be in one movie.  For people who grew up watching the old cartoons, it must’ve been mind-blowing at the time to see Bugs Bunny, Mickey Mouse, Felix the Cat, and Woody Woodpecker all in the same motion picture (not to mention the dueling piano scene with Donald Duck and Daffy Duck actually sharing the screen together).

It might not be in the AFI Top 100, but this is a seminal movie nonetheless, and, like so many other Eighties “kids movies”, it will traumatize your children (seriously, I still don’t know if I’m over that ending).

Rating: ★★★★☆

 

Full Metal Jacket

‘Full Metal Jacket’ (1987)

Thirty years after making one of the best war (and anti-war) films of all time in ‘Paths of Glory‘, Stanley Kubrick unleashed himself on a whole new generation of moviegoers with ‘Full Metal Jacket’.  This is another classic that I can’t say too much about that hasn’t been said already, the most obvious being that I can’t believe it was only nominated for one Academy Award, so I’ll praise a couple of things that I think have been underrated over the years.

First of all, most people talk about R. Lee Ermey and Vincent D’Onofrio, and that’s fine, but Matthew Modine as Pvt. Joker (you know, the protagonist of the film) gives a really good performance as well.  One of my favorite moments is the “Virgin Mary” scene, when he’s the first Private to actually stand up to Gny. Sgt. Hartman and earns himself a promotion to squad leader.  It’s a very emotional scene with a lot of shouting, yes, but you never feel like, “Oh, they’re just performing.”  No, they’re in it, and he’s in it in particular.

Secondly, did you know this entire movie (outside of some archive footage of a Parris Island graduation) was filmed in England?  England!  I bet you thought they went to the Philippines or Taiwan or at least somewhere in Asia, but no, they filmed a movie that takes place in South Carolina and Vietnam entirely in jolly old England!  If that’s not “movie magic”, I don’t know what is.

It’s a very dark movie (but surprisingly funny at times), for sure, but if I was making a list of ten war films everyone should see (regardless of your feelings on war), I’d be hard pressed to leave this one out.

Rating: ★★★★½

 

The Burbs

‘The ‘Burbs’ (1989)

For some reason I keep thinking I’m not much of a [New Jersey’s own] Joe Dante guy, but after looking at his filmography again, I’m not sure that’s true.  There must be someone else I keep confusing him with.

Anyway, I really enjoyed this movie.  It’s a very funny blend of mostly comedy with horror elements.  The wonderful ensemble cast is what truly makes it: you’ve got Tom Hanks as the stressed-out everyman who just wants to relax at home for his vacation; Carrie Fisher as his dutiful wife; Rick Ducommun as the wise-cracking sidekick and general instigator; Bruce Dern as the wily and paranoid ex-military man; Wendy Schaal as his wife (and neighborhood eye-candy); Corey Feldman as the teenager next door; and Henry Gibson, Brother Theodore, and Courtney Gains as the mysterious Klopeks (not to mention cameos from Dick Miller and Robert Picardo, because this is a Joe Dante film).

For anyone who’s ever had strange neighbors you wanted to avoid at all costs, you’ll definitely relate (and probably feel justified in that thinking).

If you’ve not seen it, definitely check it out, especially around Halloween time.

Rating: ★★★★☆

 

Continued in Part 3