Quick Thoughts – August Round-Up

Across 110th Street (1972)

Anyone who’s seen Quentin Tarantino’s Jackie Brown is familiar with this title, as the Bobby Womack single of the same name (which appears on the soundtrack album but not in the actual movie?) plays at both the beginning and end of that film.

It gets lumped in with the Blaxploitation genre, but after seeing it, it’s clear that Across 110th Street doesn’t belong there.  For one thing, the tone is too serious (there’s nothing really tongue-in-cheek about it), and there’s no strong, Black protagonist, because there’s no protagonist of any kind (we’ll come back to that).

Let’s back up for a second.  Across 100th Street begins with the violent theft of a large sum of Italian mob money by three Black robbers.  From there, it’s a race against time between the mobsters and the cops to find out who did it; the cops wanting justice for their gunned-down brethren, and the mob wanting to set an example to those who would try to steal from them.

This is where things get problematic for me, because the movie constantly cuts around between the three concerned parties (thieves, mobsters, cops), which is fine in theory, but in practice it doesn’t really allow you to connect with any character in particular, good, bad, or otherwise, and thus you never really connect with the movie as a whole.

This is not to say Across 110th Street is terrible.  As well as having some entertaining moments, the movie addresses serious issues in a mature fashion, which is admirable.  I just wasn’t expecting it to be so cold and flat from a stylistic standpoint.  It’s one thing to go that route for a based-on-a-true-story movie (like Tora! Tora! Tora!), or a this-is-what-could-happen movie (like Contagion), but for a fictional police procedural I don’t think it’s the best idea.

Rating: ★★★☆☆

 

eXistenZ (1999)

If you made a cocktail out of Videodrome, The Matrix, and Inception, you’d have eXistenZ.

I was a bit nervous about seeing this one, given David Cronenberg’s infamy for gross-out material, but eXistenZ is surprisingly measured in the body horror department (even the “Chinese Restaurant” scene didn’t really bother me, although whether or not a lot of this stuff upsets you comes down to individual tastes and fears).

The movie takes a hard look at the concept of virtual reality, and, while it may not be an action movie, it feels appropriately dream-like (without question one of the movie’s strongest aspects).  There’s also some commentary on videogames which gamers past and present will understand and appreciate.

Performance-wise, Jennifer Jason Leigh and Jude Law put in solid shifts, but I think I find the supporting roles more interesting (Ian Holm and definitely Willem Dafoe in particular).

Overall, eXistenZ may feel somewhat dated, give that it’s a late-90s vision of the future, but the way it questions our ability to unplug from the machine is as relevant now as ever.  Kudos to David Cronenberg for that.

Rating: ★★★½

 

Red Mob aka Chtoby vyzhit (1993)

Information on this movie is sketchy at best, but if you understand Russian, you can enjoy the whole film on YouTube.

The boys at Vinegar Syndrome are putting together a Blu-ray release of Red Mob and I can’t wait for it to go on sale.  It’s not on the same level of hidden gem as, say, Ninja Busters, but it is the right mix of incomprehensible and funny-bad that makes for a “magnum opus” of low-budget cinema (not to mention lots of guns and explosions).

I’m not going to bother to explain the plot, given that it took me until about forty minutes into the film to figure out who everyone was and what was going on, but I can tell you that it involves the Russian Mafia (obviously), weapons smuggling, former Soviet soldiers, kidnapping, and, if you can hold out til the end, some of the best helicopter flying I’ve ever seen committed to film.

One thing I know for sure about Red Mob is that it was shot in the former Soviet Union, maybe a couple of years after the Berlin Wall came down, and it makes use of a fairly wide variety of locations.  The only one I recognized outright is what I assume to be Moscow, but I’m guessing they also filmed quite a bit in one or more of the Central Asian states.

Anyway, like I said, I can’t wait for the Blu-ray release.  Definitely a bonkers kind of movie to be enjoyed with a group of friends.

Rating: ★★★½

(Update 05/26/17 – The Blu-ray is finally on sale: https://vinegarsyndrome.com/shop/red-mob-ltd/)

 

The Lost Boys (1987)

Before True Blood or Twilight or even Buffy the Vampire Slayer, there was The Lost Boys.

I can’t say with absolute certainty if it’s the first ever presentation of contemporary teenage vampires, but it seems to get the most credit as such.  Regardless, it’s years ahead of its time from that standpoint

And yet, it’s also very much of its own time, not just in terms of music and fashion and all that (not to mention the first ever pairing of “The Two Coreys”), but because, for whatever reason, the 1980s were the heyday of the horror comedy (Gremlins and Ghost Busters come to mind), although there has been something of a resurgence of such films in the 2000s, but we’re not talking about that, we’re talking about Joel Schumacher’s The Lost Boys.

He takes a lot of crap for Batman & Robin, which is fair (at least he owns up to it and doesn’t point fingers elsewhere), but I disagree with the popular notion that Joel Schumacher is a “bad director.”  In addition to Lost Boys, he’s also directed Falling Down and the very much underrated 8MM. as well as other successful projects, but again, we’re not talking about those; we’re talking about The Lost Boys here.

The movie is a fairly classic type of story: a family moves to a new place and discovers things are not all as they seem  But, in addition, the look of the film still holds up pretty well (I appreciate how they handled “flying” on a budget), there’s some great set design, the cast is pretty solid all around, and, most importantly, the tone is such that you can seamlessly move between horror and comedy.

If you’ve never seen it, especially with Halloween season coming up, I definitely recommend this stylish flick.

Rating: ★★★★☆

Quick Thoughts – Christmas Classics

They just don’t make ’em like they used to.

Gremlins (1984)

June 8th, 1984 saw the release of one of the greatest movies ever; a comedy-horror classic that’s had an indelible impact on pop culture.  Naturally, I’m taking about Ghost Busters, but Gremlins was released on the same day, and is a very strong effort in its own right, not to mention it has one of the best title sequences ever thanks to Darlene Love.

Written by Chris Columbus (who we’ll come back to shortly) and directed by Joe Dante (who I’ve praised before), Gremlins is another one of those 80s movies that you couldn’t do today.  Sure, everybody loves a cuddly little hero, but can you imagine the audience reaction to the 3 Rules (“Uh, they don’t make any sense; nitpick, nitpick, nitpick!”)?  Or imagine how much action schlock they’d pack in since the Mogwai/Gremlins would be CGI (and probably look terrible)?  Or how awful the comedy would be?

Gremlins works because the comedic elements and serious elements are in good balance, because it uses animatronic creatures which allows the actors to give more natural performances, and because we know who’s good, who’s bad, and what their motivations are.

Also, Jonathan Banks (aka “Mike” from Breaking Bad/Better Call Saul) is the Sheriff’s Deputy.

Rating: ★★★★½

 

Home Alone (1990)

It’s amazing how much your experience of a movie can change over time.

I’ve always enjoyed Home Alone.  I remember myself and a couple other guys would play Home Alone during preschool fun time or whatever (don’t ask me how it worked, my memory isn’t that good).  When you’re a child and you watch Home Alone, you totally want to enjoy the run of the house like Kevin McCallister, not to mention take down some burglars with some sweet booby traps.

Now that I’m older, I appreciate the sentimental moments a lot more.  I mean, what kid can really appreciate the Old Man Marley subplot?  But, as a mature adult, it gets me all emotional.

Written by John Hughes (who wrote way more movies than he directed) and directed by Chris Columbus (remember him?),  Home Alone is simply a wonderful family comedy that also uses violent slapstick to full effect, and is best enjoyed while eating some plain cheese pizza.

If you haven’t seen it, what are you waiting for, ya filthy animal!?

Rating: ★★★★½

 

It’s a Wonderful Life (1946)

I hear a lot of people dismiss this movie as saccharine schmaltz.

That was my impression as well, until I actually went to see it.

There’s no doubt that It’s a Wonderful Life is an emotional film designed to tug at your heartstrings, but what makes it so successful in that regard is that it’s not afraid to get real, and to go places most movies wouldn’t go.  I mean, how many “family movies” made today would ever show a main character preparing to kill himself?  My guess is not too many.

Sure, I can understand someone seeing the end of It’s a Wonderful Life out of context and thinking it’s way over the top, but when you’ve been there for two hours and experienced the depth of the story, and the sacrifice involved in George Bailey’s life, my friends, that is an ending well earned.

So, please, do yourself a favor and give this movie another chance next Christmastime.

Rating: ★★★★½

Quick Thoughts – Summer Round-Up, Part 2

Continued from Part 1

The Stepfather

‘The Stepfather’ (1987)

With the proliferation of PG-13 “horror” films these days, it’s almost hard to imagine a movie actually adding things to justify an R-rating, but back in the day the producers of ‘The Stepfather’ saw a PG-13 rating as a potential marketing problem.  Really though, the whole movie was kind of a marketing problem.  As you can gather from the poster, this got pushed out as something of a slasher movie, but it’s really more of a Hitchcockian thriller, like if ‘Rear Window’ and ‘Psycho’ had an Eighties baby (not that it’s Hitchcock-level quality, but the director apparently saw it as more of a dark comedy, which is a lens Hitchcock viewed much of his own work through).

We already know who the bad guy is from the very beginning, so the tension doesn’t come from the audience discovering who the killer is, but rather the characters in the movie.  It really only works as a product of its time (why they even tried to remake it and update it is beyond me), but it’s effective, and it still holds up pretty well today. despite the generational gap.

Terry O’Quinn’s performance is unquestionably the centerpiece of the film.  He’s on his A-game as a very disturbed individual trying to see if he can finally hold it all together, but the supporting actors, particularly Jill Schoelen, hold their own as well.

It might get a little corny at times, but for a horror/thriller, ‘The Stepfather’ makes a solid movie night pick.

Rating: ★★★½

 

Thunderball

‘Thunderball’ (1965)

“There’s a lot of movie in that movie.”

It’s a true statement of pretty much every Bond film since ‘Goldfinger’, but it’s perhaps most true of ‘Thunderball’.  In fact, there’s so much movie here it’s almost exhausting: you’ve got airplanes, you’ve got nuclear weapons, underwater combat, fast cars, deadly sharks, multiple bombshell women, fast boats, world extortion, electrified conference room chairs, Bahamian street festivals, an actual jetpack, Tom Jones singing, and a peeing dog.

All that said, while you do feel its length, I appreciate the producers’ effort to make a real crowd-pleaser.  The underwater scenes in particular, from both a visual and technical perspective, are overwhelmingly impressive, even now (“it’s so dense, every single image has so much going on…”).

Now, I’ll be honest, I actually like the remake (‘Never Say Never Again’) better, but only because the interplay between Sean Connery and Klaus Maria Brandauer is so much fun, at least in my opinion.  On the whole, I’d say ‘Thunderball’ remains the superior film (especially in the Bond Girl department).  Plus, ‘Thunderball’ might be the most influential spy movie on pop culture in general (it’s still the highest grossing Bond film when you adjust for inflation).

Rating: ★★★★☆

 

Who Framed Roger Rabbit

‘Who Framed Roger Rabbit’ (1988)

Boy, that Bob Zemeckis sure had a strong foothold on the mid to late Eighties, didn’t he?

I think computers have made us numb to the appreciation of animation, but back in the day (and even as recently as 2004) it was a highly labor-intensive process.  It may not have been the first and it certainly wasn’t the last, but I personally don’t know of another film that blends live-action and traditional animation to the degree that ‘Roger Rabbit’ does, and in that sense alone it is an incredible triumph of cinema.

Perhaps lost on today’s audiences is the wrangling of so many different characters from different (and, traditionally, very competitive) animation studios to be in one movie.  For people who grew up watching the old cartoons, it must’ve been mind-blowing at the time to see Bugs Bunny, Mickey Mouse, Felix the Cat, and Woody Woodpecker all in the same motion picture (not to mention the dueling piano scene with Donald Duck and Daffy Duck actually sharing the screen together).

It might not be in the AFI Top 100, but this is a seminal movie nonetheless, and, like so many other Eighties “kids movies”, it will traumatize your children (seriously, I still don’t know if I’m over that ending).

Rating: ★★★★☆

 

Full Metal Jacket

‘Full Metal Jacket’ (1987)

Thirty years after making one of the best war (and anti-war) films of all time in ‘Paths of Glory‘, Stanley Kubrick unleashed himself on a whole new generation of moviegoers with ‘Full Metal Jacket’.  This is another classic that I can’t say too much about that hasn’t been said already, the most obvious being that I can’t believe it was only nominated for one Academy Award, so I’ll praise a couple of things that I think have been underrated over the years.

First of all, most people talk about R. Lee Ermey and Vincent D’Onofrio, and that’s fine, but Matthew Modine as Pvt. Joker (you know, the protagonist of the film) gives a really good performance as well.  One of my favorite moments is the “Virgin Mary” scene, when he’s the first Private to actually stand up to Gny. Sgt. Hartman and earns himself a promotion to squad leader.  It’s a very emotional scene with a lot of shouting, yes, but you never feel like, “Oh, they’re just performing.”  No, they’re in it, and he’s in it in particular.

Secondly, did you know this entire movie (outside of some archive footage of a Parris Island graduation) was filmed in England?  England!  I bet you thought they went to the Philippines or Taiwan or at least somewhere in Asia, but no, they filmed a movie that takes place in South Carolina and Vietnam entirely in jolly old England!  If that’s not “movie magic”, I don’t know what is.

It’s a very dark movie (but surprisingly funny at times), for sure, but if I was making a list of ten war films everyone should see (regardless of your feelings on war), I’d be hard pressed to leave this one out.

Rating: ★★★★½

 

The Burbs

‘The ‘Burbs’ (1989)

For some reason I keep thinking I’m not much of a [New Jersey’s own] Joe Dante guy, but after looking at his filmography again, I’m not sure that’s true.  There must be someone else I keep confusing him with.

Anyway, I really enjoyed this movie.  It’s a very funny blend of mostly comedy with horror elements.  The wonderful ensemble cast is what truly makes it: you’ve got Tom Hanks as the stressed-out everyman who just wants to relax at home for his vacation; Carrie Fisher as his dutiful wife; Rick Ducommun as the wise-cracking sidekick and general instigator; Bruce Dern as the wily and paranoid ex-military man; Wendy Schaal as his wife (and neighborhood eye-candy); Corey Feldman as the teenager next door; and Henry Gibson, Brother Theodore, and Courtney Gains as the mysterious Klopeks (not to mention cameos from Dick Miller and Robert Picardo, because this is a Joe Dante film).

For anyone who’s ever had strange neighbors you wanted to avoid at all costs, you’ll definitely relate (and probably feel justified in that thinking).

If you’ve not seen it, definitely check it out, especially around Halloween time.

Rating: ★★★★☆

 

Continued in Part 3