Quick Thoughts – August Round-Up

Across 110th Street (1972)

Anyone who’s seen Quentin Tarantino’s Jackie Brown is familiar with this title, as the Bobby Womack single of the same name (which appears on the soundtrack album but not in the actual movie?) plays at both the beginning and end of that film.

It gets lumped in with the Blaxploitation genre, but after seeing it, it’s clear that Across 110th Street doesn’t belong there.  For one thing, the tone is too serious (there’s nothing really tongue-in-cheek about it), and there’s no strong, Black protagonist, because there’s no protagonist of any kind (we’ll come back to that).

Let’s back up for a second.  Across 100th Street begins with the violent theft of a large sum of Italian mob money by three Black robbers.  From there, it’s a race against time between the mobsters and the cops to find out who did it; the cops wanting justice for their gunned-down brethren, and the mob wanting to set an example to those who would try to steal from them.

This is where things get problematic for me, because the movie constantly cuts around between the three concerned parties (thieves, mobsters, cops), which is fine in theory, but in practice it doesn’t really allow you to connect with any character in particular, good, bad, or otherwise, and thus you never really connect with the movie as a whole.

This is not to say Across 110th Street is terrible.  As well as having some entertaining moments, the movie addresses serious issues in a mature fashion, which is admirable.  I just wasn’t expecting it to be so cold and flat from a stylistic standpoint.  It’s one thing to go that route for a based-on-a-true-story movie (like Tora! Tora! Tora!), or a this-is-what-could-happen movie (like Contagion), but for a fictional police procedural I don’t think it’s the best idea.

Rating: ★★★☆☆

 

eXistenZ (1999)

If you made a cocktail out of Videodrome, The Matrix, and Inception, you’d have eXistenZ.

I was a bit nervous about seeing this one, given David Cronenberg’s infamy for gross-out material, but eXistenZ is surprisingly measured in the body horror department (even the “Chinese Restaurant” scene didn’t really bother me, although whether or not a lot of this stuff upsets you comes down to individual tastes and fears).

The movie takes a hard look at the concept of virtual reality, and, while it may not be an action movie, it feels appropriately dream-like (without question one of the movie’s strongest aspects).  There’s also some commentary on videogames which gamers past and present will understand and appreciate.

Performance-wise, Jennifer Jason Leigh and Jude Law put in solid shifts, but I think I find the supporting roles more interesting (Ian Holm and definitely Willem Dafoe in particular).

Overall, eXistenZ may feel somewhat dated, give that it’s a late-90s vision of the future, but the way it questions our ability to unplug from the machine is as relevant now as ever.  Kudos to David Cronenberg for that.

Rating: ★★★½

 

Red Mob aka Chtoby vyzhit (1993)

Information on this movie is sketchy at best, but if you understand Russian, you can enjoy the whole film on YouTube.

The boys at Vinegar Syndrome are putting together a Blu-ray release of Red Mob and I can’t wait for it to go on sale.  It’s not on the same level of hidden gem as, say, Ninja Busters, but it is the right mix of incomprehensible and funny-bad that makes for a “magnum opus” of low-budget cinema (not to mention lots of guns and explosions).

I’m not going to bother to explain the plot, given that it took me until about forty minutes into the film to figure out who everyone was and what was going on, but I can tell you that it involves the Russian Mafia (obviously), weapons smuggling, former Soviet soldiers, kidnapping, and, if you can hold out til the end, some of the best helicopter flying I’ve ever seen committed to film.

One thing I know for sure about Red Mob is that it was shot in the former Soviet Union, maybe a couple of years after the Berlin Wall came down, and it makes use of a fairly wide variety of locations.  The only one I recognized outright is what I assume to be Moscow, but I’m guessing they also filmed quite a bit in one or more of the Central Asian states.

Anyway, like I said, I can’t wait for the Blu-ray release.  Definitely a bonkers kind of movie to be enjoyed with a group of friends.

Rating: ★★★½

(Update 05/26/17 – The Blu-ray is finally on sale: https://vinegarsyndrome.com/shop/red-mob-ltd/)

 

The Lost Boys (1987)

Before True Blood or Twilight or even Buffy the Vampire Slayer, there was The Lost Boys.

I can’t say with absolute certainty if it’s the first ever presentation of contemporary teenage vampires, but it seems to get the most credit as such.  Regardless, it’s years ahead of its time from that standpoint

And yet, it’s also very much of its own time, not just in terms of music and fashion and all that (not to mention the first ever pairing of “The Two Coreys”), but because, for whatever reason, the 1980s were the heyday of the horror comedy (Gremlins and Ghost Busters come to mind), although there has been something of a resurgence of such films in the 2000s, but we’re not talking about that, we’re talking about Joel Schumacher’s The Lost Boys.

He takes a lot of crap for Batman & Robin, which is fair (at least he owns up to it and doesn’t point fingers elsewhere), but I disagree with the popular notion that Joel Schumacher is a “bad director.”  In addition to Lost Boys, he’s also directed Falling Down and the very much underrated 8MM. as well as other successful projects, but again, we’re not talking about those; we’re talking about The Lost Boys here.

The movie is a fairly classic type of story: a family moves to a new place and discovers things are not all as they seem  But, in addition, the look of the film still holds up pretty well (I appreciate how they handled “flying” on a budget), there’s some great set design, the cast is pretty solid all around, and, most importantly, the tone is such that you can seamlessly move between horror and comedy.

If you’ve never seen it, especially with Halloween season coming up, I definitely recommend this stylish flick.

Rating: ★★★★☆

Classic Movie Treble – ‘Hudson Horror Show: March Madness’ – A Foggy Night in Yonkers

Hudson Horror Show

When I was a kid, I had something of a fascination with horror films, particularly classic ones, though I was too scared to actually watch most of them.  I used to check out books from the public library on the subject; then, when my family entered the internet age, I got all caught up on the Friday the 13th saga (fun fact: when I was in Boy Scouts, I spent a few weeks and many other weekends at the camp where they shot the original film, in Blairstown, NJ).  I suppose, on the one hand, I was drawn in by all of the craft that went into the gore and monster effects.  On the other hand, I always appreciated a good old-fashioned scary story.

Now, as an adult, I don’t usually go out of my way to watch horror films, especially contemporary ones (I don’t really like where the genre has gone to in recent years), but I do find them a lot of fun to watch with other people.  Perhaps more than any other genre, horror films increase in entertainment value the more people you have in the audience.

Thus, I found myself once again at the Alamo Drafthouse (Yonkers), this time for an abbreviated edition of the Hudson Horror Show.

Movie #1: Sleepaway Camp (1983)
Sleepaway Camp

Written and Directed by Robert Hiltzik
Cast: Mike Kellin, Katherine Kamhi, Paul DeAngelo, Felissa Rose, Frank Sorrentino
Soundtrack: Edward Bilous

I promise I will never, ever spoil the ending of this film for anyone, ever (unless they really just don’t care).  All I’ll ever say about it to those who’ve not seen it is that it’s definitely a shocker, and I’m not one that’s easily shocked.

This ain’t no ‘Ernest Goes to Camp‘; this ain’t no ‘Friday the 13th‘ either.  In fact, I’d argue that ‘Sleepaway Camp’ is more clever than anything in the ‘Friday’ series.  Most horror movies, regardless of budget, tend to ride in “scare the audience” mode for at least 90% of the runtime.  ‘Sleepaway Camp’ brings that down a few notches and actually has some good stretches that feel like a real movie about kids at camp, which gives is a lot of charm.

What I also find clever about it is that the first few deaths are made to look like accidents.  We as the audience know they’re not, but to the characters in the film they can at least be plausibly explained that way, which helps build the suspense, and makes the off-the-rails rampage of the third act that much wilder.  I also like the fact that while the movie does show off some impressive gore effects, it also knows when to leave things to your imagination (unlike most genre offerings today).

All in all, ‘Sleepaway Camp‘ is a must-see for fans of scary movies.  It’s a low budget slasher, for sure, but, as writer and director, Robert Hiltzik really elevates the material to a sum greater than that of its individual parts (having a twist that would make M. Night Shyamalan jealous certainly doesn’t hurt matters).  It’s also a great time capsule of the 1980s.  Makes me want to take a trip to Action Park.

Rating: ★★★★☆

There was an enlightening post-screening Q&A with actors Felissa Rose and Frank Sorrentino, as you can see in this blurry, pixelated photo:
Q and A

Movie #2: The Giant Spider Invasion (1975)
The Giant Spider Invasion

Directed by Bill Rebane
Written by Richard L. Huff (original story and screenplay) & Robert Easton (screenplay)
Cast: Steve Brodie, Barbara Hale, Leslie Parrish, Alan Hale, Robert Easton

Have you ever heard a movie described as “so bad, it’s good”?

This is one of those movies.  A low-budget feature about giant spiders invading Wisconsin (of all places)

The most famous actor in this is Alan Hale, who played “The Skipper” on ‘Gilligan’s Island’ (and yes, his first line in the movie is, “Hi, little buddy!”).

I don’t really have to say much more than that, but I will.

What makes ‘The Giant Spider Invasion‘ a good-bad movie (as opposed to a bad-bad movie, which we’ll get to) is not only the camp factor of the acting and special effects (which are not technically great, but you have to give them credit for trying), but also just this consistent befuddlement factor.  At a certain point I lost track of how many times I asked “What?” while watching this movie, which is often a turn-off, but in this case it wasn’t, because it actually maintained my interest.  At different points I also hypothesized that it was a prequel to both ‘Interstellar’ and ‘Pacific Rim’.

So, yeah, if you’re in the mood for a so-bad-it’s-good movie, and you can somehow track it down, give this one a watch.  I highly recommend it.

Rating: ★★★½

Movie #3: Blood Beach (1981)
Blood Beach

Directed by Jeffrey Bloom
Written by Jeffrey Bloom
(story and screenplay) & Steven Nalevansky (story)
Cast: David Huffman, Marianna Hill, John Saxon, Stefan Gierasch, Burt Young
Soundtrack: Gil Melle

This ‘Jaws‘ rip-off (only without a sea creature) was by far the most star-studded affair of the night, and, unfortunately, the most disappointing.

I hate to make such a lame joke, but ‘Boring Beach’ is more like it.  People just walk out onto the shore for one reason or another and get sucked down into the sand (and a rapist gets his manhood bit off).  There’s no variety.  Every death scene basically looks the same, and, with the exception of John Saxon and Burt Young (as Sgt. Royko from Chicago; yeah, they didn’t just pick that name out of a hat), the characters are flat and uninteresting.  There’s a pseudo-love story that doesn’t get much traction, and the ending is only satisfying in the sense that the movie is finally over.  For a 90-minute B picture, it was horribly paced.  I felt like I’d been sitting there for well more than two hours by the time I got up.

And lastly, I’m all about waiting until you’ve got your creature effect down pat before showing it off, but ‘Blood Beach’ doesn’t even give you a tease until the very end.

Forget about this one.  Pay it no mind.  Go watch Tremors instead.

Rating: ★½

So, was ‘Hudson Horror Show: March Madness’ worth it?  Overall, yes.  I had a fun time, the hospitality from Alamo was good as usual, and the enthusiasm (at least until ‘Blood Beach’) was palpable.

And my “Bug Juice” was delicious.

Drink Specials


Classic Four-Play: ‘Stallone Zone’ – Good Old American Action

Stallone Zone

I’ve made no secret of my love for Alamo Drafthouse [Yonkers].  In the past year it has become one of my favorite places to trek to (I do have to cross a big important river to get there), especially for classic films and classic film marathons (except for that time I totally bombed trying to underplay a Nic Cage impression, but c’est la vie), not to mention great food and drink.

Again I say, if you have one near you and you’ve not been there. you’re doing yourself a disservice.  Go check it out at your earliest convenience.

Anyway, if you haven’t realized it by now, my latest excursion there (now more than two weeks ago; hurray for expediency) was for Stallone Zone, a marathon of four surprise movies starring (if not also written and directed by) Sylvester Stallone (all on glorious 35mm prints), curated by Drafthousers Cristina Cacioppo (who chose the films) and Austin hipster-type Greg MacLennan (who brought the prints, and many other wonderful visual goodies).

Now, let’s be real, you have to be in a certain mindset to truly enjoy a typical Stallone movie, and I’m perfectly fine going there, because I like having a good time.  Stallone represents escapist entertainment at its adrenaline-fueled peak.  Quite frankly, Stallone Zone was probably the most fun I’ve had in one day so far this year, and that’s the honest truth; and myself and all the friends I brought can’t wait to see what’s on tap for the next Drafthouse marathon.

But, I digress.  On to the movies.  These’ll be a bit shorter than my typical reviews since I have almost a handful to get through, not to mention there’s probably not much meaningful prose I can add after 20+ years.

Movie #1: Tango & Cash (1989)

Directed by Andrei Konchalovsky [and Albert Magnoli (Uncredited)]
Written by Randy Feldman
Cast: Sylvester Stallone, Kurt Russell, Teri Hatcher, Jack Palance, Brion James, James Hong, Marc Alaimo, Philip Tan, Michael J. Pollard, Robert Z’Dar, Lewis Arquette, Edward Bunker, Michael Jeter, Clint Howard, Adolfo ‘Shabba-Doo’ Quinones, Glenn Morshower, Billy Blanks, Geoffrey Lewis
Soundtrack: Harold Faltermeyer

How serious Russian filmmaker Andrei Konchalovsky ever got involved with this project (more on Russian cinema later), the world may never know, because this is action-comedy at it’s finest.  I dare say this movie is proto-Hot Fuzz, because it’s definitely not a parody, but it knows what it is and makes no apologies for never getting too, too serious.

Stallone wonderfully plays against type as the uptight and slightly foppish Ray Tango while Kurt Russell does his usual thing with a little more lightheartedness as the fast and loose (if not downright slovenly) Gabriel Cash.  Throw in Jack Palance (and his lovely mice…over and over so you don’t forget) as your main villain and a whole tanker-truckload of snappy one-liners, and you’ve got a recipe for some big, burly laughs and a lot of [occasionally over-the-top and] enjoyable action.

I had watched this movie only once before, and I was surprised at how much I had forgotten about, but was delighted to see again.  I don’t know if John J.B. Wilson people had less of a sense of humor about themselves in 1989-90, because this movie was panned enough at the time to earn three Razzie nominations, but who cares about that now?  I certainly don’t.

★★★★☆ (Remember, this is an action-comedy.)

Movie #2: Paradise Alley (1978)

Written and Directed by Sylvester Stallone
Cast: Sylvester Stallone, Lee Canalito, Armand Assante, Frank McRae, Anne Archer, Kevin Conway, Terry Funk (yes, THAT one), Tom Waits (yes, THAT one), Joe Spinell, Frank Pesce, Frank Stallone
Soundtrack: Bill Conti

If you go to a Drafthouse marathon like Caged or Stallone Zone, you can always count on at least one really obscure pick, and this time it was Paradise Alley.  I don’t want to say too much about this film in terms of the plot, as I’d suggest you just watch it to check it out, but this movie is so Stallone that he even sings the theme song.  Apparently this was actually the first movie he wanted to make,  but it wasn’t something he could get financing for until after Rocky was a raving success.

The basic premise is that three brothers in post-WWII Hell’s Kitchen are scraping their way through life (this is the first half of the film, and I won’t lie, it’s a little bit tedious at times, but it’s worth it and it does make sense from a dramatic and narrative perspective), until finally they get an opportunity to make some real money by working together.

This is another role where Stallone plays against his usual type in the sense that his character isn’t really likable, but don’t worry, there’s a bit of an arc.  Honestly though, as Stallone-centric as this movie is, it’s the supporting cast that really makes it, particularly Armand Assante in his first major film role.  The dynamic dynamic of the three brothers is crucial, but the menagerie of other characters is also a big help to making the story and the compact world it’s set in come alive.

It’s not a perfect film by any stretch, but I do recommend Paradise Alley, if only based on the strength of its second half (which is much more action-packed).

★★★½

Movie #3: Demolition Man (1993)

Directed by Marco Brambilla
Written by Peter M. Lenkov and Robert Reneau (Screenplay and Story), and Daniel Waters (Screenplay)
Cast: Sylvester Stallone, Wesley Snipes, Sandra Bullock, Nigel Hawthorne, Benjamin Bratt, Bob Gunton, Rob Schneider (Uncredited), Denis Leary, Jesse Ventura (Bit Part), Jack Black (Bit Part), Glenn Shadix, Grand L. Bush, Steve Kahan, Troy Evans, Don Charles McGovern, Bill Cobbs
Soundtrack: Elliot Goldenthal

So, this is a very interesting movie, because it’s a popcorn action flick built upon the framework of a really solid science fiction premise (I suppose Robocop would be another good example, though Paul Verhoeven’s satire is much more biting).  Some people might say the future is played too cheesy here, and, yeah, it goes a little too far with that at times, but on the whole the fact that it seems off-putting actually works in the movie’s favor, because you’re seeing things through the eyes of our primary characters; and let’s face it, if you suddenly woke up 36 years into the future, you’d probably think everything and everybody was pretty weird.

From a visual perspective, obviously the action scenes are great (the opening sequence leaves quite an impression), but the overall look and feel of the future is very well done, and still holds up pretty well 20+ years later (except for all the Oldsmobile references, but, you know that?  Go watch 2001 or 2010 again and try to hate on them in the same way; yes, I just compared those to Demolition Man).

This movie has another great pairing of stars as well, except unlike Tango & Cash, Stallone is up against Snipes in this one, and there’s pretty strong action hero/villain chemistry between them, not to mention some good old-fashioned fish-out-of-water comedy.

Not much else to say about this one; just classic 90s action.

★★★½ Stars
(★★★★★ for the sweet S.A.P.D. hats we all got as part of the package)

This picture is what you call a “segue”.

Movie #4: Rocky IV (1985)

Written and Directed by Sylvester Stallone
Cast: Sylvester Stallone, Talia Shire, Burt Young, Carl Weathers, Brigitte Nielsen, Tony Burton, Dolph Lundgren, James Brown (yes, THAT one), Michael Pataki
Soundtrack: Vince DiCola

Forget Ronald Reagan.  Rocky Balboa was the man who single-handedly defeated Communism.

Whatever you think you know about this film, you really haven’t seen it unless you’ve watched it on the big screen with a pumped-up group of fans.  By this point in the day (it was well into the night actually), the Stallone Zone audience was so into everything that the festivities were less like a film screening, and more like a live concert, with the crowd cheering for every fan favorite and greatest hit.  A couple of my friends and I were even doing air toms during one of the famous training montages.

Speaking of montage, there are no less than five montages in this film (you easily lose count after a while).  Maybe it’s as simple as Stallone wanting to play tastemaker because he really liked the bands on the soundtrack, but in the absence of a thorough explanation, I offer a radical hypothesis:

Perhaps Stallone is such a proficient student of film that he used the opportunity of a movie where his character fights a big Russian in “the heart of the Soviet Union” to pay tribute to early Russian cinema, as montage editing was pioneered in the late 1910s and 1920s by Soviet filmmakers Lev Kuleshov and Sergei Eisenstein.

Or maybe that’s all wrong.  It doesn’t matter.

Rocky IV is great because it makes you feel great, and if you don’t like it, you hate America.  End of story.

Ⅳ out of Ⅴ Stars.

 

Hearts on Fire, baby.