Classic Twofer – A 007 Double Feature: ‘For Your Eyes Only’ & ‘The Spy Who Loved Me’

Roger Moore passed away a month ago at the age of 89.

Officially (it’s a long story why I have to say “Officially”), he was the longest-tenured actor to play James Bond, making seven films (I guess he truly was 007) over twelve years, from Live and Let Die in 1973 to A View to a Kill in 1985 (and appearing in thirteen other films over the same period, a few of which I’d personally recommend).

To the surprise of some, I’m sure, he was also the oldest, so it’s natural that he’d be the first to leave us, but it makes the occasion no less melancholy.

It’s no secret how much I love James Bond. and with Moore’s death I gave some serious thought as to which 007 portrayal is my favorite.  Honestly, in terms of overall body of work, I have to give it to Roger.  Sure, Connery has my favorite individual movie (From Russia With Love), but Moore is just so charming, and so dryly humorous, and he clearly enjoyed what he did.

He often gets blamed for the “campy” turn the franchise took in the Seventies and Eighties, but as Isaac Chotiner so expertly pointed out, the writing was already on the wall with Diamonds Are Forever (I mean, that movie is Schlock with a Kapital K), before Moore was officially brought on board, so, blame Roger if you want, but, you’re wrong.

Anyway, in the wake of Moore’s passing, I was hoping somebody out there would put together a tribute screening, and, fortunately, AMC Theaters did just that (appropriately raising money for UNICEF in the process, for whom Roger was a long-time ambassador), and they did a good job of picking two out of seven choices (although I’m not sure why they were shown out of order at the screening I attended), in that they pretty much show the full breadth of the franchise, from down-to-earth to over-the-top (and, as most post-1969 Bond movies are either rehashes of From Russia With Love, Goldfinger, or You Only Live Twice, these two definitely fall in line).

My only nitpick is that neither of these films feature a score by John Barry, but I suppose you can’t have everything all the time.

Let’s get to it.

 

Original Release Date: June 26, 1981
Directed by John Glen
Written by Richard Maibaum and Michael G. Wilson
Cast: Roger Moore, Carole Bouquet, Topol, Lynn-Holly Johnson, Julian Glover, Cassandra Harris, Jill Bennett, Michael Gothard, John Wyman, Jack Hedley, Lois Maxwell, Desmond Llewelyn, Geoffrey Keen, Walter Gotell, James Villiers, John Moreno, Charles Dance, Toby Robins, Stefan Kalipha, Graham Crowden, Noel Johnson, Paul Brooke, Eva Reuber-Staier, John Wells, Janet Brown, John Hollis, Jeremy Bulloch, Victor Tourjansky
Soundtrack: Bill Conti

This has always been one of my favorites in the Bond franchise, and it’s definitely one of the most low-key (like if Mike Stoklasa got his wish and they made a live-action Batman movie where he just takes down one crime syndicate).

Not that For Your Eyes Only isn’t without it’s more over-the-top moments, e.g. the pre-title sequence where Bond dispatches of an unnamed “Blofeld” (that long story again), the hockey rink scene, and the “Margaret Thatcher” ending.  But, by and large, it’s fairly reigned in; perhaps the grittiest of Moore’s tenure.

The basic outline is something of a cross-pollination of From Russia With Love and Thunderball, in that Bond has to track down a sunken MacGuffin device to make sure it doesn’t fall into the wrong hands, and there’s a gorgeous girl who’s closely related to it along for the adventure.

In terms of Bond movie elements, as silly as the pre-title sequence is, I like that it’s completely unrelated to the rest of the plot; this would only happen one more time in Octopussy (much like that cameo from Smithers, but we’ll talk about that later) and as of SPECTRE it’s still yet to happen again.  I also enjoy when Bond has strong allies (a la Kerim Bey) at his side, and I like that Q gets to have a humorous moment outside of his lab, so these are pluses as well.  Sadly, Bernard Lee died before his scenes could be filmed, so M is conspicuously absent.

As far as the cast goes, it may not be the longest list of all-stars (I’m still not sure why they cast Topol, but I’m not complaining; he’s great in this), but it’s well-assembled nonetheless (and how Julian Glover got to be in Star Wars, James Bond, and Indiana Jones is a delicious mystery).  Everybody fills their roles nicely and helps bring out the appropriate emotional response to each scene.  Nobody’s particularly flamboyant or scenery-chewing, but that’s fine in this movie.  One might argue that the one sore spot is Lynn Holly-Johnson as Bibi Dahl, but I think she’s true to the character as written, so ultimately I don’t take issue with her performance.

I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention long-time Bond veteran but first-time director John Glen (who would helm the franchise for the whole of the decade) and first-time Bond cinematographer Alan Hume (who would see out Moore’s tenure, and also shot a little movie called Return of the Jedi).  Most Bond films excel visually, but I particularly like the look of this one, especially all the magic hour stuff.

Really, I’d say For Your Eyes Only is just about the perfect Bond movie, except for one thing: no trains the music.

This is not to say that Bill Conti isn’t a fine composer in his own right, and, to be fair to him, there are at least one or two cues I really enjoy, but, on the whole, I don’t think he’s a fit, and his sound sticks out like a sore thumb in this context.

Other than that, it’s hard to complain.  You’ve got James Bond, beautiful women, travel to a variety of locations, guns, cars, underwater photography, helicopter stunts, skiing, climbing, and Détente.

Outside of a train fight, what more could anyone ask?
(Speak of the devil and he shall appear.)

Rating: ★★★★½ (out of five)

 

Original Release Date: July 8, 1977
Directed by Lewis Gilbert

Written by Christopher Wood and Richard Maibaum
Cast: Roger Moore, Barbara Bach, Curd Jürgens, Richard Kiel, Caroline Munro, Walter Gotell, Geoffrey Keen, Bernard Lee, George Baker, Michael Billington, Desmond Llewelyn, Edward de Souza, Vernon Dobtcheff, Lois Maxwell, Nadim Sawalha, Eva Reuber-Staier, Robert Brown, Milton Reid, Cyril Shaps, Milo Sperber, Albert Moses, Shane Rimmer, Ray Hassett, Jeremy Bulloch, Victor Tourjansky
Soundtrack: Marvin Hamlisch

Ah, the first Bond movie of the post-Saltzman era (and post-Hamilton era; coincidence?).

The Spy Who Loved Me marks a return to BIG for the franchise.  Wider widescreen, bigger sets (the 007 Stage at Pinewood Studios was first built for this film), bigger stunts (the parachute jump), bigger miniatures (not even joking), bigger henchman (Jaws), bigger frenemies (the Soviets are brought in like we’ve never seen before), etc., all of which are completely appropriate given that it’s the first of two consecutive rehashes of You Only Live Twice (this and Moonraker, which is another favorite of mine despite being the polar opposite of For Your Eyes Only), also directed by Lewis Gilbert (and both featuring Blofeld stand-ins, although I do enjoy Curd Jürgens in this).

As I said before, most Bond movies excel visually, The Spy Who Loved Me being no different (apparently Stanley Kubrick himself gave some secret assistance), but this one really lays on the old movie magic.  From Ken Adam’s gigantic sets to Derek Meddings’ “miniatures” (honestly, this movie has some of the best model work I’ve ever seen; not that everything looks great, but certain things legitimately look plausibly full-size, and in water to boot) to the Lotus that transforms into a submarine, it’s hard not to feel a sense of wonderment when the movie goes big.

However, the film is unfortunately weighed down by a pair of albatrosses.

First off is Barbara Bach’s performance as Anya Amasova aka Agent XXX (GET IT!?).  The less said about it, the better.

Second is Marvin Hamlisch’s score, which is crazy, because I have to dog a guy who’s not only an EGOT winner, but has a Pulitzer Prize on top of it.  But, you know what?  It wasn’t my decision to go Full Disco.  That was his choice, and it was a poor one (to be clear though, it’s not the worst top-to-bottom score in Bond history).  The title song is great though, I won’t deny that (even if it feels slightly out of place).

As far as the Bond movie elements go, this one makes heavy use of Bond’s Royal Navy cover, which I’m a big fan of, and we’re introduced to Robert Brown as Admiral Hargreaves (who would replace Bernard Lee as M in from Octopussy to Licence to Kill).  We’re also introduced to Walter Gotell as General Gogol (M’s opposite number in Moscow), who would feature from this film through The Living Daylights.  And there’s a train fight, which always makes me happy (even if it’s not nearly as good as the original).

In the end, The Spy Who Loved Me is number one (or close to it) on a lot of people’s Bond lists, but I’ve never seen it that way (feels like nostalgia over judgement to me).  Not that I dislike it, I’m happy to watch it, I just think the general consensus is somewhat inflated.  I recommend it well enough, but more so as a cultural touchstone than as a movie.

Although, it was Roger Moore’s favorite, which is a much better note to end on.

Rating: ★★★½ (out of five)

Nobody did it better.

 

P.S.
For you Empire Strikes Back fans out there, in addition to Julian Glover (aka General Veers), Jeremy Bulloch (aka the guy in the Boba Fett suit) has a cameo as “Smithers” in For Your Eyes Only (and Octopussy), and is also a submarine crewman in The Spy Who Loved Me.  And John Hollis (aka Lobot) plays the unnamed “Blofeld” during the intro of For Your Eyes Only.

You might also recognize Ray Hassett, who plays another crewman in The Spy Who Loved Me, who’s the guy who informs Han Solo that Commander Skywalker never checked back in to Echo Base (and also plays “Harry” the unfortunate policeman in Superman).

Quick Thoughts – Bond in Motion: A Diary of 007 On Screen, Part 2 of 3

Bonds

Continued from Part 1

1973: Live and Let Die

  • Roger Moore is here, the first Bond who’s actually English.
  • The Beatles are here!  Well, Paul McCartney and George Martin (their producer, often known as “The Fifth Beatle”).
  • No more uber-widescreen; we’ve switched to a taller 1.66 : 1 aspect ratio.
  • This seems a strange one to introduce a new actor with.  I mean, you’ve got voodoo, tarot cards, Harlem, and New Orleans/greater Louisiana to give the whole thing a real Blaxploitation vibe.  It doesn’t help that there’s no more SPECTRE or Blofeld either.
  • Two important Bond movie precedents: the henchman with an impediment-turned-enhancement (Tee Hee), and a fictional country playing a key role (San Monique).
  • The watch is starting to get out of hand.  Not only does it have a powerful magnet, but apparently it can also turn into a spinning blade.
  • Overall, ‘Live and Let Die’ is not a very strong entry in the 007 series, but it does have a pretty fantastic (and long) speedboat chase.  It’s like the ‘Bullitt’ or ‘French Connection’ of boat chases.
  • Jane Seymour.

 

1974: The Man With the Golden Gun

  • It hard to put my finger on why this one doesn’t stand out.  Maybe it’s because the MacGuffin is solar power, but I don’t know.  Even the theme song is pretty blasé.
  • I find it a bit odd that despite jet setting all around the Orient, from Macau to Hong Kong to Bangkok (complete with Muay Thai), at no time does Bond end up with an Asian girl.
  • That said, the Hong Kong setting offers one of my favorite Bond movie sets: the Secret Service headquarters aboard the wreck of the RMS Queen Elizabeth.  Very clever indeed.
  • Poor Britt Ekland.  She plays arguably the most ineffectual Bond girl of them all (at least in terms of ones who live), and it’s not even her fault; it’s the character as written.
  • I really don’t know what else to say.  I like Christopher Lee.  I like the car flip.  I like that car-plane.  There’s just not much to talk about with this one; for a 007 movie, it’s pretty simple.

 

1977: The Spy Who Loved Me

  • Big is back.  We’ve returned to 2.35 : 1 Panavision, but we’ve also returned to big sets, big locations, and big effects (like blowing up some fine-looking miniatures).  It’s very similar to ‘You Only Live Twice’ (including bringing back Lewis Gilbert to direct), but done ten years later, so certain things look better.
  • Submarines!  I love submarines.
  • Detente: The Soviets enter the scene in a way we haven’t seen before.
  • We’ve also never seen another agent tag along for such an extended period of time.
  • Karl Stromberg may not be Ernst Stavro Blofeld, but Curd Jurgens plays a great supervillain nonetheless.
  • Introduction of arguably the most iconic henchman of all time: Jaws.
  • A Lotus that turns into a submarine.  Total fiction, but movie magic makes it real enough.
  • Lots of wonderful underwater photography, as we’ve come to expect from this series.

 

1979: Moonraker

  • A lot of people point to this one as the nadir of the series, but I couldn’t disagree more.  In terms of entertainment value, I think it ranks near the top.  Does it get a little silly at times?  Yes.  Was it cashing in on the Star Wars craze?  Yes, but who wasn’t in 1979? *COUGH*StarTrek*COUGH*
  • Also, in terms of cinematic spectacle, ‘Moonraker’ goes all out.  Derek Meddings’ effects were rightfully nominated for an Oscar, and I’d argue that this film represents Ken Adam’s best work in terms of production design.  I mean, these guys gave us the Space Shuttle before NASA did!  That’s impressive.
  • Michael Lonsdale as Hugo Drax is one of the best (and most ruthless) villains in the series, and despite things getting hokey at times, I think his doomsday plot is an effective MacGuffin.
  • The cinematography is downright beautiful, and they take full advantage of Rio de Janeiro’s vistas.
  • People often rate Lois Chiles as Dr. Holly Goodhead one of the worst Bond Girls, but I disagree.  Despite the dumb name, she’s one of my favorites, not only because she’s gorgeous, but she’s also a good foil as well.
  • Space Marines!  No, not like ‘Aliens’, but Marines in outer space nonetheless.

 

1981: For Your Eyes Only

  • Blofeld returns!  Well, sort of.  The intro to this one features a bald man in a wheelchair with a white cat trying to get the best of 007, but not succeeding.  No doubt a rather open middle finger to Kevin McClory, who Eon was in near constant litigation with over the story rights to ‘Thunderball’.
  • How do you follow up going to space?  Come back down to Earth, of course.  This is among the best in the series because of the focus of the story and the commitment to keeping as many things as possible “real” in the camera lens.
  • Carole Bouquet as Melina Havelock: beautiful, deadly, and gorgeous dark hair for days.  Love her.
  • How B.A. Baracus is Julian Glover that he’s played a Star Wars Imperial General, a Bond Villain, and an Indiana Jones Villain (in that order)?  The world needs to know!
  • He’s a curious casting choice, but I actually like Topol in this movie.  Gives it some heart.
  • Sadly, Bernard Lee passed away before they started filming, making M conspicuously absent.
  • Another curiosity is Bill Conti (of ‘Rocky’ fame) doing the score.  I don’t know if his style is a good fit.

 

1983: Octopussy

  • The pre-credits sequence gets back to what I like, which is James Bond finishing another mission that’s totally unrelated to the plot of the movie.  Something to merely whet the audience’s appetite rather than setting the plot in motion.  Don’t get me wrong, the other way can be done very well, but as a general rule I like it to be the end of a different adventure.
  • This is another movie, like ‘For Your Eyes Only’ where everything is kept pretty tight and practical.  However, it is punctuated by some rather silly moments that take you out of the movie (like a Tarzan yell).
  • There aren’t really any supervillains in this one, but I do enjoy Louis Jourdan and Kabir Bedi and villain and henchman, respectively.
  • There’s also a really cool weapon in this one, which I will simply refer to as the giant yo-yo of death.
  • As for Octopussy herself, she’s okay, I guess.  Maud Adams wasn’t really given a whole lot in the script, so I just have to assume she did the best with what she had.

 

1983: Never Say Never Again (non-Eon)

  • With respect to “Cubby” Broccoli and the rest of the Eon crew, this was the superior Bond movie of 1983.  Yes, it’s a rehash of ‘Thunderball’, but it’s got the right balance of wit, girls, gadgets, and high stakes; not to mention Sean Connery (and he’s not phoning it in this time).  It goes in my Top Five without question.
  • Klaus Maria Brandauer as Maximillian Largo is among my favorite Bond villains.  He’s a crazy killer, yet charmingly playful, and the repartee between he and Connery makes the movie for me.
  • I like that fact that the movie actually makes reference to changing times and embraces Bond getting older.
  • This might be the closest we ever get to a Spielberg/Lucas 007 project.  Director Irvin Kershner was hot off of ‘The Empire Strikes Back’, cinematographer Douglas Slocombe shot the Indiana Jones trilogy, and the sound stage work was done at Elstree Studios (as were the Star Wars and Indy films).  Honestly, there are so many crossovers with the cast and crew alike, I can’t name them all here.

 

1985: A View to a Kill

  • A lot of people hate on this one, and for good reason: Roger Moore’s too old (and he knew it), Christopher Walken was not a good fit to play this particular villain, it’s arguably the worst crop of Bond girls ever, and the finale takes place on a blimp.
  • All that said, I like the actual story and how it’s told, even if it’s somewhat of a rehash of Goldfinger.  Max Zorin’s background and his going rogue are interesting elements, and it’s nice to see a villainous plot that’s much more localized than then entire world.
  • I like the subtle nod to ‘My Fair Lady‘ in the racetrack scene (Moneypenny makes a certain outburst).
  • San Francisco doesn’t seem to be the most obvious location for a Bond movie, but they get a lot out of it.
  • Snowboarding, cool.
  • Believe it or not, the strongest aspect of this one might be the music.  It’s not all great, but the Duran Duran theme is cool, and John Barry has some really nice french horn-heavy cues.

 

1987: The Living Daylights

  • New Bond; new Moneypenny.  It’s interesting watching this now, because I think they were trying to accomplish so much of what ‘Casino Royale’ was going for 19 years later, like, “The series has become too bloated and unrealistic; we need to find a younger, tougher Bond and put him in something that’s closer to reality.”  They didn’t strip things down to degree that ‘Casino Royale’ does, but they definitely want you to know that this is a NEW Bond with a NEW attitude.  Maybe the world wasn’t quite ready for it, “but your kids are gonna love it.”
  • Many people think they don’t like Timothy Dalton as James Bond, but I think he’s rather well-suited for the role.  He’s almost an amalgam of the previous three: the toughness of Connery, the humanity of Lazenby, and the sophistication of Moore.  Maybe that makes him jack of all trades, master of none, but he’s not a “bad Bond” by any stretch.
  • If ‘The Living Daylights’ has one particular weakness, I think it’s a slight case of Too-Many-Villains Syndrome; and I wouldn’t call the story convoluted, but if you blink you might miss what the endgame is, and that can be frustrating in a movie you just want to be entertained by.
  • I’m not sure if it was intended as a nod to ‘The Third Man’ or not, but 007 does ride the Riesenrad (giant Ferris wheel) while in Vienna.
  • Of all the 007-mobiles, the Aston Martin in this one is my favorite.

 

1989: Licence to Kill

  • Some movies, particularly ones that exist as part of a franchise, earn a bad reputation because they have an identity crisis.  ‘Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom’, ‘Mission: Impossible 2’, and ‘Licence to Kill’ all suffer from this.  They are fine movies of their own merit, but as part of their larger series they feel out of place.  Frankly, ‘Licence to Kill’ might be one of the best action movies of the Eighties, but so much about it feels so un-Bond like that it turns people away.
  • That said, this movie marks the end of an epoch in cinema history.  In 27 years, Eon Productions churned out 16 James Bond films, but the series would go underground for more than half a decade, a veritable eternity given the usual turnaround time.  No more “Cubby” Broccoli at the helm producing; no more Cold War; no more John Barry scores or Maurice Binder title sequences; no more Pan Am flights; no more Richard Maibaum scripts; no more rear screen projection; and no more “Bond continuity” through different actors.  It was a hard goodbye for the audience.
  • Until the Daniel Craig movies, David Hedison was the only actor to portray Felix Leiter in multiple films, but why they brought him back for this one in particular I don’t understand, especially since John Terry had played the role two years earlier in ‘The Living Daylights’.  See what I mean about that “Bond continuity”?  Very strange.

Continued in Part 3

Quick Thoughts – Bond in Motion: A Diary of 007 On Screen, Part 1 of 3

Bonds

This is a bit counter to one of People Talking’s principles, because I’ve not seen any of these in a theater lately (although I’ve already reviewed ‘Thunderball’), but in preparation for ‘SPECTRE’, I’ve watched every single James Bond motion picture (including both non-EON films and a 1954 episode of CBS’s ‘Climax!’), and recorded my fresh thoughts and impressions of each in this space.

As there are 26 separate items to digest, these will be published in three posts over a three day period, rather than all at once.

 

1954: Casino Royale (CBS’s ‘Climax!’)

  • Well, now I know that everyone should really start with this one first, because it actually explains Baccarat (apparently it’s like Blackjack, except you’re trying to get closest to Nine, Aces are worth One, and Tens and Face Cards are worth Zero).
  • Barry Nelson as American James “Jimmy” Bond is very American; “Clarence” Leiter is very British (even though Michael Pate was actually Australian).
  • Peter Lorre as the first on-screen Bond villain is quite apropos.
  • It shows its age, but it’s still pretty dramatic; I imagine a television audience in the Fifties would have found it quite thrilling.

 

1962: Dr. No

  • Much like ‘Star Trek: The Motion Picture’, a lot of fans and people in general refer to ‘Dr. No’ as “The Boring One”, and I understand that comment, especially in comparison to the films that followed, but I’ve always had a soft spot for it.
  • I like the fact that other than his new Walther PPK and a geiger counter, there are no “Bond Gadgets” in this one; that’s a precedent yet to be set.
  • Really, ‘Dr. No’ feels more like a detective story than a spy movie as we think of them today; James Bond, while suave and sophisticated, is honestly in over his head by the end of the movie.
  • One precedent that is set in ‘Dr. No’ is the super-villain complete with amazing super-villain lair.  For a film with a relatively low-budget (most of the non-principle guys and girls are dubbed over by the same guy and girl, respectively), Ken Adam did some great production design.

 

1963: From Russia With Love

  • Ahhh, sequels; double the budget of the original and see what happens.  This is actually a great sequel because it does two things good sequels should do: pick up after the last movie (Sylvia Trench shows up at the beginning again; SPECTRE wants revenge for Dr. No), and expand the universe (first “appearance” of SPECTRE’s “Number One”).
  • Multiple Bond movie precedents are set: first pre-title scene (with a twist!), first title song (although it’s not sung during the opening credits, but rather the end credits), first “appearance” of Blofeld, first appearance of Desmond Llewelyn as Q, and first appearance of an actor whose character is killed off in one movie, but returns on screen in another movie as a new character (Walter Gotell appears in this movie as Morzeny; returns later in six Moore/Dalton movies as Soviet General Gogol).
  • We haven’t gone full 007 yet.  ‘From Russia With Love’, while far more expansive geographically than ‘Dr. No’, is still low-key compared to the rest of the franchise, and I rather like it because of that.  The “gadgets” are still very plausible (I rather like the compact sniper rifle), and even the goals of the villains are pretty small and personal; no doomsday machines or worldwide extortion plots.

 

1964: Goldfinger

  • First of all, James Bond in the USA, everybody.  James Bond in America.  I have to think that had a factor in the popularity of this one.
  • Second of all, now we’re talking.  This is like ‘Friday the 13th: Part 3’ when Jason Voorhees puts on the hockey mask.  We’ve got a pre-title scene with our hero, a title song actually sung over the opening credits, ridiculously named women (Pussy Galore?  C’mon.), we’ve got things that don’t exist in real life (like “skin asphyxiation”), we’ve got the kitted-out Aston Martin, we’ve got a henchman with some kind of impediment, Felix Leiter is played by a different actor than the last time, and we’ve got 007’s magical…appendage (it turns bad girls good).  This is the James Bond franchise from here on out, people.  Embrace the madness.
  • Also, compared to ‘From Russia With Love’, which has about a full hour of mostly build-up, ‘Goldfinger’ gets off to a fast start; I’m talking like five minutes after the opening credits, we’re in it.
  • What was even the point of the Masterson sisters?  Maybe they had a larger role in the novel, but they seem awfully expendable in the movie.
  • Honestly, as seemingly important as it is to the franchise, I’m not sure Goldfinger ranks in my personal Top 5 Bond Movies.

 

1965: Thunderball

  • Go big or go home.  This was the first Bond film shot in 2.35 : 1 Panavision widescreen (‘Dr. No’, ‘From Russia With Love’,  and ‘Goldfinger’ were all shot in 1.37 : 1 aspect ratio).
  • Another movie, another actor playing Felix Leiter.
  • Four 007 pictures in four years?  Now I know why Connery got so burned out on the role.
  • Baccarat scenes carry so much more weight when you know how Baccarat actually works.
  • Claudine Auger, I mean, just, wow.
  • Fans of ‘The Dark Knight’ will recognize the Skyhook recovery system.
  • I’ve already talked about this movie; you can read more thoughts here.

 

1967: Casino Royale (non-Eon)

  • What?
  • You know when a movie is so incomprehensible that somebody says, “It feels like it was directed by five different people”?  This actually was directed by five different people, and it feels as such.
  • That said, this ‘Casino Royale’ is meant to be a comedy, so I don’t judge it the same was as any other Bond movie.  It definitely has its laughs, but as parody movies go, it’s got nothing on Mel Brooks.
  • If you’ve ever wondered where the spinning bed scene in ‘Austin Powers’ came from, it came from this movie (among other things, like Burt Bacharach).
  • Also, classic ‘Family Guy’ fans will recognize one of the musical cues from Stewie’s “sexy party” cutaways.
  • A few actors in ‘Casino Royale’ had already been in other previously released Bond films, and many more would feature in 007 movies yet to come.

 

1967: You Only Live Twice

  • We’ve always known Universal Exports as part of Bond’s cover, but this is the first movie to make reference to his military rank (Royal Navy Commander).
  • Also, first fully on-screen appearance of Ernst Stavro Blofeld, played by Donald Pleasence (perfectly cast).  SPECTRE’s Number One finally gets a face, and what a face it is.
  • Ninjas!?  I know Menahem Golan took credit for introducing Western audiences to Ninjas with ‘Enter the Ninja’, but it would appear he was well-beaten to the punch.
  • Two years after showing off the jetpack, James Bond gets another flying machine to wear a geeky helmet in (Little Nellie).
  • This is the first Bond movie where 007 doesn’t get his orders from M in London, but rather some exotic location (in this case, a submarine).  In fact, the whole movie takes place outside the Western hemisphere.
  • I particularly like the music in this one.  Very lush and cinematic.
  • What does 007 need with a bunch of MSG?  Seriously, as part of his subterfuge at Osato, he asks for a bunch of monosodium glutamate.  Weird.
  • Really interesting: author Roald Dahl wrote the screenplay for this one.

 

1969: On Her Majesty’s Secret Service

  • Well, Sean Connery’s gone; replaced by Australian-born George Lazenby, who is different in so many ways.
  • Up until the Daniel Craig era, this was the longest Bond movie, clocking in at almost two-and-a-half hours.
  • Diana Rigg.  Yes, please.
  • It feels like they decided to pretty completely throw out the “Bond formula” for this one.  It’s slightly psychedelic and a just a touch campy, but at the same time very personal and human.  I don’t think there’s another film in the Eon series that offers a true comparison.  I mean, you’ve got a courtship montage, he’s falling in love, we see him very vulnerable, we see him totally screwed and ready to just give up; this is not the James Bond we’ve been accustomed to, then or now.  It’s like he’s a real human being who doesn’t have all the answers.
  • First time in the series that 007 tries to tender his resignation, and the first time he goes rogue.
  • So, is the character still supposed to be the same even though it’s a different actor?  He breaks the fourth wall by saying, “This never happened to the other fellow,”  but then there are multiple direct references to the past films in the series, as if it was him.  I don’t know.
  • Apparently the downbeat ending was actually supposed to be the intro to the next movie, but then Lazenby’s agent gave him some really dumb advice and convinced him to quit the role, thus setting the stage for a one-off return of Sean Connery.

 

1971: Diamonds Are Forever

  • Oh, boy.  The panic moves.  “Oh, no; people didn’t like the last one.  We gotta bring back Sean Connery (even though he’s older and doesn’t really look like James Bond anymore), we gotta bring back Guy Hamilton to direct; we even have to bring back Shirley Bassey to sing the theme song.  And the last one ended on a downer, so we gotta make this one funnier.”
  • The movie starts out with Bond all pissed off and looking for Blofeld, I assume to get revenge for his wife, but they never say so; again, is it the same character?  I don’t know.
  • The main gimmick for this one is James Bond in Las Vegas, and, much like Vegas, everything feels a bit cheap and trashy (and campy), especially that moon rover thing.  It just looks awful.
  • It’s not all bad though, I like Jimmy Dean (even though it’s totally random why he’s in it), and I like Charles Gray’s approach to the Blofeld character.  And who wouldn’t love some Jill St. John?
  • That said, there are a number of elements in this one that ‘Austin Powers’ borrowed, and rightfully so (like the cover industrial organization).

Continued in Part 2